Ottey v. DHS/ICE
| Dwayne Ottey |
| DHS/ICE |
| 1:2019cv05697 |
| June 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 st |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 PETITIONER'S RESPONSE TO RESPONDENTS MOTION TO DISMISS OR TRANSFER CASE TO THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA IN THE FORM OF AN AFFIDAVIT. Document filed by Dwayne Ottey. (vn) |
| Filing 13 ADDITIONAL CLAIMS FOR EMERGENCY BIVENS COMPLAINT TO SHOW CAUSE FOR VIOLATION OF PETITIONER'S SUBSTANTIVE "COLORABLE AND COGNIZABLE" FOURTH AND FIFTH AMENDMENT CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS IN THE FORM OF AN AFFIDAVIT. Document filed by Dwayne Ottey. (vn) (Main Document 13 replaced on 8/16/2019) (sac). |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Motion served on Dwayne Ottey on 7/26/19. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by DHS/ICE. (Kahane, Joshua) |
| Filing 11 DECLARATION of Deportation Officer Mario A. Garaffa in Support re: #9 MOTION to Transfer Case to the Northern District of Alabama. MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction /venue.. Document filed by DHS/ICE. (Kahane, Joshua) |
| Filing 10 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #9 MOTION to Transfer Case to the Northern District of Alabama. MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction /venue. . Document filed by DHS/ICE. (Kahane, Joshua) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Transfer Case to the Northern District of Alabama., MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction /venue. Document filed by DHS/ICE.(Kahane, Joshua) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joshua Evan Kahane on behalf of DHS/ICE. (Kahane, Joshua) |
Filing 7
HABEAS INFORMATION PACKAGE MAILED to Dwayne Ottey 055212953 Etowah County Detention Center Unit 9 827 Forrest Ave. Gadsen, AL 35901, at, on 6/27/2019 Re: #6 Order to Answer. The following document(s) were enclosed in the Service Package: a copy of the order of service or order to answer and other orders entered to date, the individual practices of the district judge and magistrate judge assigned to your case, Instructions for Litigants Who Do Not Have Attorneys, Notice Regarding Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Case Files, a Motions guide, a notice that the Pro Se Manual has been discontinued, a Notice of Change of Address form to use if your contact information changes, a handout explaining matters handled by magistrate judges and consent form to complete if all parties agree to proceed for all purposes before the magistrate judge. (nb)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO ANSWER, 28 U.S.C. 2241: The Court, having examined the petition in this action, which Petitioner filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241, hereby ORDERS that: The Clerk of Court shall electronically notify the Civil Division of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York that this Order has been issued. Within 30 days of the date of this order, the U.S. Attorney's Office shall file an answer or other pleadings in response to the petition. Petitioner may file reply papers, if any, within 21 days from the date Petitioner is served with Respondent's answer. The Court does not, at this time, order a stay of removal. However, to assure that the Court's ability to resolve Petitioner's claim is not mooted by events, Respondents are further ORDERED to provide the Court with 48 hours' notice of any intent to remove Petitioner from the United States. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 6/26/2019) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (ama) Transmission to Pro Se Assistants for processing.
|
| Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (ma) |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (ma) |
| Filing 4 Violation of Fourth Amendment "Warrantless Arrest" on ICE Detainers and Other Constitutional. Document filed by Dwayne Ottey. (rdz) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Emergency Temporary Restraining Order. Document filed by Dwayne Ottey.(rdz) |
| Filing 2 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. (Filing Fee $ 5.00, Receipt Number 465401238016)Document filed by Dwayne Ottey.(rdz) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (rdz) |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ottey v. DHS/ICE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: DHS/ICE | |
| Represented By: | Joshua Evan Kahane |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Dwayne Ottey | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
