Garcia v. Fish Republic LLC et al
Anastacio Garcia |
Jose Paulo Cortes and Fish Republic LLC |
1:2019cv06116 |
June 30, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
J Paul Oetken |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the undersigned counsel for the parties, as follows: 1.Defendants' time to serve the Verified Answer or otherwise move is extended from August 30, 2019 to September 10, 2019. 2.This agreement may be executed in counterparts by facsimile or electronic signatures. SO ORDERED. (Motions due by 8/30/2019.) (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 8/26/2019) (kv) |
Filing 9 LETTER addressed to Judge J. Paul Oetken from Lawrence F. Morrison dated August 26, 2019 re: Extension of time for Defendants to file their Answer.. Document filed by Fish Republic LLC.(Morrison, Lawrence) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Jose Paulo Cortes served on 7/12/2019, answer due 8/2/2019. Service was accepted by employee. Document filed by Anastacio Garcia. (Hassan, Abdul) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the undersigned counsel for the parties, as follows: 1. Defendants' time to serve the Verified Answer or otherwise move is extended from July 29, 2019 to August 30, 2019. 2. Defendants waive any and all defenses as to insufficient service of process and lack of personal jurisdiction. 3. This agreement may be executed in counterparts by facsimile or electronic signatures. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 7/30/2019) (jca) |
Filing 6 LETTER addressed to Judge J. Paul Oetken from Lawrence F. Morrison dated 7/30/2019 re: Stipulation to Adjourn Defendants' Time to Answer the Plaintiff's Complaint. Document filed by Jose Paulo Cortes, Fish Republic LLC.(Morrison, Lawrence) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Fish Republic LLC served on 7/8/2019, answer due 7/29/2019. Service was accepted by NY Secretary of State. Document filed by Anastacio Garcia. (Hassan, Abdul) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Jose Paulo Cortes, Fish Republic LLC. (dnh) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge J. Paul Oetken. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (dnh) |
Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (dnh) |
Case Designated ECF. (dnh) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Hassan, Abdul) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Fish Republic LLC, d/b/a Savida, and Jose Paulo Cortes, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Anastacio Garcia. (Hassan, Abdul) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jose Paulo Cortes, Fish Republic LLC. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-17168961)Document filed by Anastacio Garcia.(Hassan, Abdul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.