Abergel v. Yahoo! Inc.
| Isaac Mike Abergel |
| Yahoo! Inc. |
| 1:2019cv06281 |
| July 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Louis L Stanton |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
CIVIL JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the complaints are dismissed under Rule 12(h)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this judgment to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 7/22/2019) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Clerk of Court is directed to assign these matters to my docket, mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, and note service on the docket. Plaintiff's complaints, filed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1), are dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 7/22/2019) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. 28 U.S.C. 1915. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 7/22/2019) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| Mailed a copy of #3 Order Granting IFP Application to Isaac Mike Abergel 1715 East 3rd Street Apt. 1 Brooklyn, NY 11223. (vba) |
| Mailed a copy of #5 Judgment - Sua Sponte (Complaint), Notice of Appeal Forms, to Isaac Mike Abergel 1715 East 3rd Street Apt. 1 Brooklyn, NY 11223. (vba) |
| Mailed a copy of #4 Order of Dismissal, to Isaac Mike Abergel 1715 East 3rd Street Apt. 1 Brooklyn, NY 11223. (aea) |
| NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Louis L. Stanton. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (sac) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Yahoo! Inc.. Document filed by Isaac Mike Abergel.(rdz) |
| Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Isaac Mike Abergel.(rdz) |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Abergel v. Yahoo! Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Isaac Mike Abergel | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Yahoo! Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
