Diaz v. Barbour Inc.
| Edwin Diaz |
| Barbour Inc. |
| 1:2019cv06302 |
| July 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Kevin Nathaniel Fox |
| Paul G Gardephe |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Barbour Inc. and without costs pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Edwin Diaz. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)..(Mizrahi, Joseph) |
Filing 15
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. all discovery of whatever nature shall be initiated so as to be completed on or before January 24, 2020; 2. a telephonic status conference shall be held with the parties on December 12, 2019, at 10:45 a.m. Counsel to the plaintiffs shall initiate the telephonic conference; 3. the last date on which to amend pleadings will be November 1, 2019; 4. the last date on which to join additional parties will be November 1, 2019; 6. any dispositive motion shall be made in accordance with the Individual Rules of Practice of the assigned district judge ; and 7. if no dispositive motion is made, the parties shall submit their joint pretrial order to the court on or before February 24, 2020. That document must conform to the requirements for such an order that are found in the Individual Rules of Practice of the assigned district judge. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox on 9/27/2019) ( Amended Pleadings due by 11/1/2019., Discovery due by 1/24/2020., Joinder of Parties due by 11/1/2019., Pretrial Order due by 2/24/2020., Telephone Conference set for 12/12/2019 at 10:45 AM before Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox.) (ks)
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox: An Initial Pretrial Conference was held on 9/26/2019. (Midwood, Laura) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Edward Y. Kroub on behalf of Edwin Diaz. (Kroub, Edward) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER: An initial pretrial conference will be held in the above-captioned action on September 26, 2019, at 10:00 a.m., in courtroom 228, 40 Centre Street, New York, New York. At least five (5) days before the conference, the parties must meet or confer by telephone to discuss the matters specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(1) and must complete the attached questionnaire. No discovery plan specified by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) needs to be filed with the Court, but counsel to the plaintiffs must submit the completed questionnaire to the chambers of the undersigned, via facsimile, to (212) 805-6712, at least two (2) days before the conference. At or prior to the meeting or telephonic conference between the parties, the parties must comply with the automatic disclosure requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(l). In addition, if the plaintiff(s) seeks damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff(s) must provide signed authorizations for release of all pertinent records from medical service providers. During the scheduled initial pretrial conference, the parties must be fully prepared to discuss any issues pertaining to this case, including subject matter jurisdiction, venue, schedules for discovery, insurance coverage and settlement. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox on 9/4/2019) (ks)
|
| Set/Reset Hearings: Initial Conference set for 9/26/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 228, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox. (ks) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting nunc pro tunc to July 29, 2019, #7 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. (HEREBY ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox)(Text Only Order) (Fox, Kevin Nathaniel)
|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint. Document filed by Barbour Inc..(Blackwell, Lindsey) |
| Filing 10 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent J. Barbour & Sons Ltd. for Barbour Inc.. Document filed by Barbour Inc..(Blackwell, Lindsey) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Lindsey Blackwell on behalf of Barbour Inc.. (Blackwell, Lindsey) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Mercedes Colwin on behalf of Barbour Inc.. (Colwin, Mercedes) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Judge Paul G. Gardephe from Christopher A. Seacord dated July 29, 2019. Document filed by Barbour Inc..(Seacord, Christopher) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Barbour Inc. served on 7/9/2019, answer due 7/30/2019. Service was accepted by Kamesha James, Agent. Document filed by Edwin Diaz. (Mizrahi, Joseph) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for General Pretrial (includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement). Referred to Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 7/10/2019) (jca)
|
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Barbour Inc.. (pne) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Paul G. Gardephe. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (pne) |
| Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pne) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pne) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Barbour Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Edwin Diaz. (Mizrahi, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Mizrahi, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Barbour Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-17204122)Document filed by Edwin Diaz.(Mizrahi, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Diaz v. Barbour Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Edwin Diaz | |
| Represented By: | Joseph H Mizrahi |
| Represented By: | Edward Y. Kroub |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Barbour Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Aaron Seacord |
| Represented By: | Lindsey Blackwell |
| Represented By: | Mercedes Colwin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
