Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
Lisa M. Miller |
Commissioner of Social Security |
Social Security Administration |
1:2019cv06530 |
July 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Colleen McMahon |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. § 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Received returned mail re: #5 Order Directing Original Signature. Mail was addressed to Lisa M. Miller 3475 Third Avenue Bronx, NY 10456 and was returned for the following reason(s): Return to Sender; Insufficient Address; Unable to Forward. (aea) |
Mailed a copy of #5 Order Directing Original Signature, to Lisa M. Miller 3475 Third Avenue Bronx, NY 10456. (aea) |
|
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Colleen McMahon. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (wb) |
Mailed a copy of #3 Standing Order re Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings in Social Security Cases, to Lisa M. Miller 3475 Third Avenue Bronx, NY 10456. (aea) |
Filing 4 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. Document filed by Lisa M. Miller.(sac) |
|
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security. Document filed by Lisa M. Miller. (sac) |
Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Lisa M. Miller.(sac) |
Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.