Levy v. Baruch College et al
| Fred M. Levy |
| NYC Department of Finance and Baruch College |
| 1:2019cv07106 |
| July 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Colleen McMahon |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 LETTER addressed to Judge Colleen McMahon from Fred Levy, dated 9/17/19 re: Plaintiff requests that the Court grant him an extension of time in which to receive the results of investigations of the EEOC by Senator Pat Toomey and Congressman Matt Cartwright, which could take up to ninety days. Document filed by Fred M. Levy.(sc) |
| Filing 10 LETTER addressed to Judge Colleen McMahon from Fred Levy, dated 9/13/19 re: Plaintiff writes to the Court that since the defendants have utilized illegal foul play, dirty tricks and broken laws, they therefore nee to pay Fred Levy; and that Boruch College can pay Fred Levy a certified check for $22,500.00; and the NYC Department of Finance needs to pay him $24,500.00 etc. Document filed by Fred M. Levy.(sc) |
| Filing 9 LETTER addressed to Judge Colleen McMahon from Fred Levy, dated 9/13/19 re: Plaintiff informs the Court that as far as the Court's direction to file an Amended IFP Application, he filled it out as per Coppedge v. US, 369U.S. 438(1962) on if it is applicable to him; that it states "If it appears from the face of the papers filed in the Court of Appeals that Applicant will present issues for review which are not clearly frivolous, the Court of Appeals should grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, appoint counsel to represent the appellant and proceed to consideration of the appeal on the merits in the same manner that it considers paid appeals. P.369U.S. 446. Document filed by Fred M. Levy.(sc) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS. Document filed by Fred M. Levy.(sc) |
| Mailed a copy of #7 Order Directing Payment of Fee or IFP Application,to Fred M. Levy 1320 Winding Way Monroe, PA 18466. (aea) |
Filing 7
ORDER: By order dated August 19, 2019, the Court directed Plaintiff, within 30 days, to either pay the $400.00 in filing fees or submit an amended in forma pauperis ("IFP") application. On September 12, 2019, the Court received from Plaintiff a letter requesting additional time to comply with the Court's order. Plaintiff's request is granted. Plaintiff is granted an additional 30 days from the date of this order to pay the $400.00 in fees or submit an amended IFP application. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed. No further extensions will be granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be take in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). Filing Fee due by 10/15/2019. In Forma Pauperis (IFP) Application due by 10/15/2019. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 9/13/2019) (mro) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| Filing 6 LETTER addressed to Judge Colleen McMahon from Fred Levy, dated 9/9/19 re: Plaintiff requests that the Court grant an extension of time, to 9/25/19, in which to file an amended application to proceed without prepayment of fees and costs. Document filed by Fred M. Levy.(sc) |
| Filing 5 LETTER from Fred M. Levy, re: Plaintiff writes to the Court that he will be out of town from 8/26/19to 9/1/19, and will return on 9/2/19. Document filed by Fred M. Levy.(sc) |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Colleen McMahon. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (wb) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEE OR AMENDED IFP APPLICATION: The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket, mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff, and note service on the docket. Plaintiff is directed to render payment of the filing fee or submit an IFP application to this Court's Pro Se Office within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Filing Fee due by 9/18/2019. In Forma Pauperis (IFP) Application due by 9/18/2019. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 8/19/2019) (Attachments: #1 amended IFP application)(ees) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| Mailed a copy of #4 Order Directing Payment of Fee or IFP Application, to Fred M. Levy 1320 Winding Way Monroe, PA 18466. (aea) |
| Filing 3 LETTER from Fred M. Levy, dated 7/31/19 re: Plaintiff informs the Court that he has tried to get an attorney for this matter who is responsive and capable; and he, therefore, requests that the Court grant him an extension of 60 days to comply. Document filed by Fred M. Levy.(sc) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Baruch College, NYC Department of Finance. Document filed by Fred M. Levy.(rdz) |
| Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Fred M. Levy.(rdz) |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
