Christenson v. Flyn
Plaintiff: Mark C. Christenson
Defendant: Maureen Flyn
Case Number: 1:2019cv07155
Filed: July 29, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Colleen McMahon
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 20, 2019 Received returned mail re: #2 Order of Dismissal, #3 Judgment - Sua Sponte (Complaint),. Mail was addressed to Mark C. Christenson 11313 19th Av. NE Seattle, WA 98125 and was returned for the following reason(s): Return to Sender Attempted Not Knwon Unable to Forward. (vba)
August 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CIVIL JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that under the June 20, 2018 order in Christenson v. Roe, No. 18-CV-3319 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. June 20, 2018), the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this judgment to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 8/2/2019) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
August 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1651: On June 20, 2018, Plaintiff was barred from filing any new action in forma pauperis (IFP) without first obtaining from the Court leave to file. See Christenson v. Roe, No. 18-CV-3319 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. June 20, 2018). Plaintiff files this new pro se case, but he does not seek leave to proceed IFP nor does he pay the filing fees. The Court assumes for the purpose of this order that he seeks to proceed IFP. Because Plaintiff has not sought leave of the Court to file, this action is dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with the June 20, 2018 order. The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket, mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, and note service on the docket. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 8/2/2019) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
August 2, 2019 Mailed a copy of #3 Judgment - Sua Sponte (Complaint), #2 Order of Dismissal, Notice of Appeal Forms, to Mark C. Christenson 11313 19th Av. NE Seattle, WA 98125. (vba)
August 2, 2019 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Colleen McMahon. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (sac)
July 29, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Maureen Flyn. Document filed by Mark C. Christenson. (sac)
July 29, 2019 Case Designated ECF. (sac)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Christenson v. Flyn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark C. Christenson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Maureen Flyn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?