Safier-Kaplan et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
| Carol A Safier-Kaplan and Murray Kaplan |
| Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. and Johnson & Johnson |
| 1:2019cv07169 |
| July 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Analisa Torres |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 pl |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER: Having received notification from Plaintiffs that this case is expected to be transferred to the multidistrict litigation court, it is hereby ORDERED that the initial pretrial conference and joint submission deadline are ADJOURNED sine die. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 9/27/2019) (cf)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER: To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. (as further set forth in this Order). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 8/6/2019) (kv)
|
|
Filing 3
INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER: Counsel for all pa1iies are directed to appear for an initial pretrial conference, in accordance with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, at 11:40 a.m., on October 8, 2019, in Courtroom 15D of the United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York. Principal trial counsel must appear at this and all subsequent conferences. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS IS DIRECTED TO IMMEDIATELY SEND A COPY OF THIS NOTICE AND THE COURT'S INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES TO ALL PARTIES. (as further set fort in this Order). SO ORDERED. Initial Conference set for 10/8/2019 at 11:40 AM in Courtroom 15D, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Analisa Torres. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 8/6/2019) (kv)
|
| Case Designated ECF. (dnh) |
| Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (dnh) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Brian Alan Goldstein. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: alias party name was omitted. (dnh) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Analisa Torres. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (dnh) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Goldstein, Brian) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-17348431)Document filed by Carol A Safier-Kaplan, Murray Kaplan.(Goldstein, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
