M.O. et al v. New York City Department Of Education,
M. O. |
New York City Department Of Education, |
1:2019cv07174 |
July 31, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Katherine Polk Failla |
Civil Rights: Education |
20 U.S.C. ยง 1415 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Received e-mail from the United States District Court - Eastern District of New York acknowledging receipt of transferred case. Assigned Case Number: 1:19-cv-05104, filed on 09/06/2019. (sjo) |
Filing 11 ORDER: Upon reviewing Plaintiff's complaint, the Court notes that all of the events giving rise to Plaintiff's claims took place in or around Kings County, New York. This case, therefore, appears to be properly venued in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Accordingly, this action is hereby ORDERED transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a). (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 8/26/2019) (mro) |
CASE TRANSFERRED OUT ELECTRONICALLY from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the United States District Court - District of Eastern District of New York (mro) |
Filing 10 ORDER denying #9 Letter Motion for Conference. Defendant's application for the Court to set a briefing schedule for Defendant's anticipated motion to dismiss and adjourn the pre-motion conference currently scheduled for September 12, 2019, is DENIED. The Court will consider a briefing schedule for Defendant's anticipated motion to dismiss at the pre-motion conference. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 8/21/2019) (rj) |
Filing 9 LETTER MOTION for Conference re: #7 Letter, reply addressed to Judge Katherine Polk Failla from Martin Bowe dated Aug. 20, 2019. Document filed by New York City Department Of Education,.(Bowe, Martin) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #6 Letter Motion for Conference. The Court is in receipt of Defendant's letter seeking a pre-motion conference regarding an anticipated motion to dismiss (Dkt. #6), and Plaintiff's letter in partial opposition. The Court GRANTS Defendant's application for a pre-motion conference. The parties are hereby ORDERED to appear on September 12, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. SO ORDERED. Pre-Motion Conference set for 9/12/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Katherine Polk Failla. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 8/19/2019) (ne) |
Filing 7 LETTER addressed to Judge Katherine Polk Failla from Jason H. Sterne dated August 19, 2019 re: Defendant's request for pre-motion conference. Document filed by M. O.(individually), M. O.(on behalf of N.O., a child with a disability).(Sterne, Jason) |
Filing 6 LETTER MOTION for Conference premotion addressed to Judge Katherine Polk Failla from Martin Bowe dated Aug. 16, 2019. Document filed by New York City Department Of Education,.(Bowe, Martin) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Martin John Bowe, Jr on behalf of New York City Department Of Education,. (Bowe, Martin) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to New York City Department Of Education,. (dnh) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Katherine Polk Failla. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (dnh) |
Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (dnh) |
Case Designated ECF. (dnh) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Sterne, Jason) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to New York City Department of Education, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by M. O.(individually), M. O.(on behalf of N.O., a child with a disability). (Sterne, Jason) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against New York City Department Of Education,. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-17348597)Document filed by M. O.(individually), M. O.(on behalf of N.O., a child with a disability).(Sterne, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: M.O. et al v. New York City Department Of Education, | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: M. O. | |
Represented By: | Jason Hale Sterne |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: New York City Department Of Education, | |
Represented By: | Martin John Bowe, Jr |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.