Riley v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
| Tracey Riley |
| JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and JP Morgan Chase & Co. |
| 1:2019cv07283 |
| August 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 nr |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Notice of Removal with Exhibits, Civil Cover, 7.1 Rule served on Ami Morgenstern, Esq. on August 5, 2019. Service was made by MAIL. Document filed by JP Morgan Chase & Co., JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Nappi, Stephen) |
| Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent JP Morgan Chase & Co. for JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.. Document filed by JP Morgan Chase & Co., JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A..(Nappi, Stephen) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Nappi, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme Court, County of New York. Case Number: 152717-2019. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-17372208).Document filed by JP Morgan Chase & Co., JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Summons and Complaint., #2 Exhibit B-Verified Answer, #3 Exhibit C- Demaned fpr BP, Combined Demands and Ad Damnum., #4 Exhibit D- Redacted-Verified-BP-and-Resp--to-Combined-Demands, #5 Exhibit E -Articles-of-Association-)(Nappi, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
