Tatum-Rios v. Caastle Inc.
Plaintiff: Lynette Tatum-Rios
Defendant: Caastle Inc.
Case Number: 1:2019cv07392
Filed: August 7, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Paul A Engelmayer
Referring Judge: Robert W Lehrburger
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 cv
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2019 Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint. Document filed by Caastle Inc..(Benson, Ryan)
September 30, 2019 Filing 12 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Caastle Inc..(Benson, Ryan)
September 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Ryan T. Benson to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (HEREBY ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger)(Text Only Order) (rsh)
September 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #8 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to respond to the Complaint addressed to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer from Ryan T. Benson dated September 6, 2019 filed by Caastle Inc. ENDORSEMENT: On August 8, 2019, the Court referred this case to the Hon. Robert W. Lehrburger, Magistrate Judge, for general pretrial. Accordingly, all non-dispositive pretrial motions should be addressed to Judge Lehrburger. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 9/6/2019) (ne)
September 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Letter Motion for Extension of Time (HEREBY ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger)(Text Only Order) (Lehrburger, Robert)
September 9, 2019 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #7 MOTION for Ryan T. Benson to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-17554354. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
September 6, 2019 Filing 8 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to respond to the Complaint addressed to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer from Ryan T. Benson dated September 6, 2019. Document filed by Caastle Inc..(Benson, Ryan)
September 6, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION for Ryan T. Benson to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-17554354. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Caastle Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Benson, Ryan)
August 28, 2019 Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. Caastle Inc. served on 8/19/2019, answer due 9/9/2019. Service was accepted by Sue Zouky, Authorized Agent in the Office of the Secretary of State. Document filed by Lynette Tatum-Rios. (Lipsky, Douglas)
August 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for General Pretrial (includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement). Referred to Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger. The parties are hereby notified that this Court has written on a legal issue that appears central to this case: the applicability of the ADA to websites. See Del-Orden v. Bonobos, Inc., No. 17 Civ. 2744 (PAE), 2017 WL 6547902 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 20, 2017). (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 8/8/2019) (rro)
August 8, 2019 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Caastle Inc.. (sj)
August 8, 2019 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (sj)
August 8, 2019 Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (sj)
August 8, 2019 Case Designated ECF. (sj)
August 7, 2019 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Lipsky, Douglas)
August 7, 2019 Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Caastle Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Lynette Tatum-Rios. (Lipsky, Douglas)
August 7, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Caastle Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-17391778)Document filed by Lynette Tatum-Rios.(Lipsky, Douglas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tatum-Rios v. Caastle Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Caastle Inc.
Represented By: Ryan T Benson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lynette Tatum-Rios
Represented By: Douglas Brian Lipsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?