Diaz v. Zazzle Inc.
Edwin Diaz |
Zazzle Inc. |
1:2019cv07424 |
August 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
George B Daniels |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER: granting #16 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 1/08/2020) (ama) |
Filing 16 LETTER MOTION to Adjourn Conference addressed to Judge George B. Daniels from Joseph H. Mizrahi dated 1/7/2020. Document filed by Edwin Diaz.(Mizrahi, Joseph) |
Filing 15 ORDER granting #14 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply: SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 12/5/2019) (jwh) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Zazzle Inc. answer due 12/18/2019. (jwh) |
Filing 14 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint addressed to Judge George B. Daniels from Michael A. Keough dated 12/4/2019. Document filed by Zazzle Inc..(Keough, Michael) |
Filing 13 ORDER granting #12 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference: The initial conference is adjourned from December 3, 2019 to January 14, 2020 at 9:30 a.m. (Initial Conference set for 1/14/2020 at 09:30 AM before Judge George B. Daniels.) (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 11/21/2019) (jwh) |
Filing 12 LETTER MOTION to Adjourn Conference addressed to Judge George B. Daniels from Michael A. Keough dated 11/20/2019. Document filed by Zazzle Inc..(Keough, Michael) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 11/5/2019) (mro) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Zazzle Inc. answer due 12/4/2019. (mro) |
Filing 10 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint addressed to Judge George B. Daniels from Michael A. Keough dated 11/4/2019. Document filed by Zazzle Inc..(Keough, Michael) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply: Defendant's request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's complaint, (ECF No. 8), is GRANTED. Defendant's response to the complaint is due by November 4, 2019. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 9/5/2019) (jwh) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Zazzle Inc. answer due 11/4/2019. (jwh) |
Filing 8 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint addressed to Judge George B. Daniels from Michael A. Keough dated 9/4/2019. Document filed by Zazzle Inc..(Keough, Michael) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Michael Anthony Keough on behalf of Zazzle Inc.. (Keough, Michael) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Zazzle Inc. served on 8/15/2019, answer due 9/5/2019. Service was accepted by Liana Larson, Associate General Counsel. Document filed by Edwin Diaz. (Mizrahi, Joseph) |
Filing 5 INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: An Initial pretrial conference will be held on Tuesday, December 3, 2019 at 9:30 a.m. at the United States District Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York, Courtroom 11A. And as set forth herein. SO ORDERED. Initial Conference set for 12/3/2019 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 11A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge George B. Daniels. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 8/14/2019) (ama) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Zazzle Inc.. (sj) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge George B. Daniels. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (sj) |
Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (sj) |
Case Designated ECF. (sj) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Zazzle Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Edwin Diaz. (Mizrahi, Joseph) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Mizrahi, Joseph) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Zazzle Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-17396988)Document filed by Edwin Diaz.(Mizrahi, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Diaz v. Zazzle Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Edwin Diaz | |
Represented By: | Joseph H Mizrahi |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Zazzle Inc. | |
Represented By: | Michael Anthony Keough |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.