Ulbricht v. United States of America
Petitioner: Ross William Ulbricht
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 1:2019cv07512
Filed: August 12, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Lorna G Schofield
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION to Vacate Notice of Motion under 28 USC 2255. Document filed by Ross William Ulbricht.(Newland, Zachary)
October 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 DECLARATION of Ross William Ulbricht in Support re: #7 MOTION to Vacate Set Aside, or Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. Section 2255.. Document filed by Ross William Ulbricht. (Newland, Zachary)
October 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #7 MOTION to Vacate Set Aside, or Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. Section 2255. . Document filed by Ross William Ulbricht. (Newland, Zachary)
October 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION to Vacate Set Aside, or Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. Section 2255. Document filed by Ross William Ulbricht.(Newland, Zachary)
October 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #4 Motion to Unseal. Petitioner's September 30, 2019, filing provides that the Government is not opposed to these requests and that the materials are necessary for Petitioner's 2255 proceeding. It is hereby ORDERED that the motion to unseal is GRANTED. Due to the necessity for these materials to be publicly available for purposes of the 2255 motion and the lack of opposition to this request, the materials shall be unsealed. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 10/9/2019) (cf) Transmission to Sealed Records Clerk for processing.
October 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #4 CONSENT MOTION to Unseal Prior Order of Court and Letters from Defense Counsel. filed by Ross William Ulbricht. ENDORSEMENT: Counsel for petitioner shall, by October 8, 2019, send an email to the Chambers inbox (with a copy to the Government) that includes as attachments the three documents that it requests be unsealed. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 10/2/2019) (cf)
September 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CONSENT MOTION to Unseal Prior Order of Court and Letters from Defense Counsel. Document filed by Ross William Ulbricht.(Newland, Zachary)
August 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Lorna G. Schofield from Zachary L. Newland dated 8/6/2019 re: Both Ulbricht and the United States respectfully ask the Court to adopt this proposed agreed briefing schedule. The parties believe that this proposed schedule is appropriate and would ensure that justice is served. ENDORSEMENT: Petitioner shall file his motion by October 10, 2019. The Government shall file its response by December 10, 2019. Petitioner shall file his reply, if any, by January 10, 2020., (Motions due by 10/10/2019., Responses due by 12/10/2019, Replies due by 1/20/2020.) (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 8/19/2019) (cf)
August 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 DUPLICATE ORDER: Document 373 in case 1:14-cr-68 (LGS), It is hereby ORDERED that the pending motions to vacate are denied as moot. ORDERED that Petitioner shall file a new motion to vacate and memorandum of law by September 6, 2019. The Government shall file a response by September 27, 2019. These memoranda of law shall not exceed twenty-five (25) pages. Petitioner shall file a reply not exceeding ten (10) pages by October 9, 2019. The Court of Clerk is respectfully directed to (i) close all open motions in 14 Cr. 68; (ii) open a related civil matter in connection with Petitioners Motion to Vacate (Dkt 361) and (iii) file this order in the above captioned case and the newly opened matter. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 7/26/2019) (gp)
August 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (28 U.S.C. 2255). PLEASE SEE CRIMINAL CASE: 1:14-cr-68 (LGS).Document filed by Ross William Ulbricht.(gp)
August 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Case Designated ECF. (gp)
August 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (gp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ulbricht v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: Vladislav Vainberg
Represented By: Michael Daniel Neff
Represented By: Timothy Turner Howard
Represented By: Eun Young Choi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ross William Ulbricht
Represented By: Zachary Lee Newland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?