Vesa v. NYC Human Resources Administration (NYC-HRA) et al
| Livius C. Vesa |
| NYC Human Resources Administration (NYC-HRA), Director Amy Weiswasser and Supervisor Jessica K. Russell |
| 1:2019cv07661 |
| August 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Gregory H Woods |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 AFFIRMATION OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. NYC Human Resources Administration (NYC-HRA) served on 10/3/2019, answer due 10/24/2019. Service was accepted by NYC Corporation Counsel(unnamed). Document filed by Livius C. Vesa. (sc) |
| Filing 6 AFFIRMATION OF SERVICE of Preservation Notice of Paper Documents and Electronically Stored Information, served on NYC Human Resources Administration(NYC-HRA), Amy Weiswasser, Jessica K. Russell on 8/23/19. Document filed by Livius C. Vesa. (sc) |
| Filing 5 AFFIRMATION OF SERVICE of Notice of Initial Pretrial Conference; served on NYC Human Resources Administration(NYC-HRA), Amy Weiswasser, Jessica K. Russell on 10/3/19. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Livius C. Vesa. (sc) |
| ***DELETED DOCUMENT. Deleted document number #5 ORDER. The document was incorrectly filed in this case. (kv) |
Filing 4
NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: An initial pretrial conference with the Court will be held on October 22, 2019 at 4:00 p.m. at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Court House, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York, in Courtroom 12C. Any party proceeding pro se (without an attorney) must appear in person. Any party who has retained counsel prior to the conference need not personally attend and should instead have their attorney attend on their behalf. By the date of the initial pretrial conference, counsel for any represented party is required to register as a filing user in accordance with the Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Plaintiff is directed to serve a copy of this order on Defendants and to file proof of service with the Court. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff by certified mail and by regular, first-class mail. SO ORDERED. (Initial Conference set for 10/22/2019 at 04:00 PM in Courtroom 12C, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Gregory H. Woods.) (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 8/29/19) (yv) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| Mailed a copy of #4 Order for Initial Pretrial Conference, to Livius C. Vesa 62-09 64th Street Apt. 3 Middle Village, NY 11379 by Certified Mail # 7018 3090 0001 2331 3805 with Return Receipt Requested and by first class regular mail. (vba) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (sac) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NYC Human Resources Administration (NYC-HRA), Jessica K. Russell, Amy Weiswasser. (Filing Fee $400.00, Receipt Number 465401242099) Document filed by Livius C. Vesa. (sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to NYC Human Resources Administration (NYC-HRA), Jessica K. Russell, Amy Weiswasser. (sac) |
| Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
