Pannell v. Schenectady County Jail Sheriff et al
| Joseph Shawn Pannell |
| Dr. John McPhillips, Captain Cufari, Sgt. Catalono, Schenectady County Jail Sheriff, Sgt. Derochie and Captain Purdy |
| 1:2019cv07905 |
| August 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Colleen McMahon |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Received e-mail from the United States District Court - Northern District of New York acknowledging receipt of transferred case. Assigned Case Number: 9:19-cv-01081, filed on 08/30/2019. (sjo) |
| Mailed a copy of #4 Order, to Joseph Shawn Pannell DIN No. 19A2354 Washington Correctional Facility 72 Lock Eleven Lane P.O. Box 180 Comstock, NY 12821-0180. (vba) |
| CASE TRANSFERRED OUT ELECTRONICALLY from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the United States District Court - District of Northern District of New York. (sac) |
Filing 4
TRANSFER ORDER: Plaintiff alleges that while he was detained in the Schenectady County Jail, Defendants denied him adequate medical care for an ear infection, causing him to suffer partial hearing loss. Because Plaintiff does not allege that any defendant resides in this district or that a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to his claim arose in this district, venue is not proper in this Court under 1391(b)(1), (2). Plaintiff's claims arose in Schenectady County, which is in the Northern District of New York. See 28 U.S.C. 112(a). Accordingly, venue lies in the Northern District of New York, 28 U.S.C. 1391(b)(2), and this action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, 28 U.S.C. 1406(a). The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket, mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, and note service on the docket. The Clerk of Court is further directed to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. Whether Plaintiff should be permitted to proceed further without prepayment of fees is a determination to be made by the transferee court. A summons shall not issue from this Court. This order closes this case. The Clerk of Court is directed to docket this as a "written opinion" within the meaning of Section 205(a)(5) of the E-Government Act of 2002. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 8/23/2019) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. Transmission to Office of the Clerk of Court for processing.
|
| NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Colleen McMahon. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (sac) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER AUTHORIZATION. Document filed by Joseph Shawn Pannell.(sac) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Catalono, Cufari, Derochie, John McPhillips, Purdy, Schenectady County Jail Sheriff. Document filed by Joseph Shawn Pannell. (sac) |
| Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Joseph Shawn Pannell.(sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
