Scott-Adams v. H&M et al
Plaintiff: Gwendolyn Scott-Adams
Defendant: Andrew L. Satenberg, Esq. and H&M
Case Number: 1:2019cv07941
Filed: August 22, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: George B Daniels
Referring Judge: Ona T Wang
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2e Job Discrimination (Unlawful Employment Practices)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 21, 2019 Request for Copies/Transcripts/Docket Sheet Processed: Mailed copy of Docket Sheet to Gwendolyn Scott-Adams at P.O. Box 313, Bronx, NY 10458 on 10/21/2019. (bwa)
October 17, 2019 Filing 23 PRO SE MEMORANDUM, dated 10/17/19 re: CHANGE OF ADDRESS for Gwendolyn Scott-Adams. New Address: P.O. Box 313, Bronx, New York, 10458. (sc)
October 17, 2019 Filing 22 LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang from G. Scott-Adams, dated 10/17/19 re: NOTIFICATIONS. Document filed by Gwendolyn Scott-Adams.(sc)
October 17, 2019 Filing 21 LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang from G. Scott-Adams, dated 10/8/19 re: FEDEX SERVICE NOT RECEIVED & ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS. Document filed by Gwendolyn Scott-Adams.(sc)
October 17, 2019 Filing 20 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: Gwendolyn Scott-Adams consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by Gwendolyn Scott-Adams.(sc)
October 17, 2019 Request for Copy of updated Docket Sheet Received: Re #22 Letter. Request for Docket Report, from G. Scott-Adams received on 10/17/19. Transmission to Pro Se Assistants for processing. (sc) Modified on 10/18/2019 (sc).
October 17, 2019 Filing 19 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Notice of Motion to Dismiss; Notice Pursuant to Local Rule 12.1; Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss; Declaration of Kenneth D. Friedman; Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement; and Unreported Cases pursuant to Local Rule 7.2 served on Gwendolyn A. Scott-Adams on 10/17/2019. Service was made by U.S. Mail and Email. Document filed by H&M. (Newman, Danielle)
October 11, 2019 Filing 18 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. H&M served on 10/9/2019, answer due 10/30/2019. Service was accepted by Davell Bornia - Manager. Document filed by Gwendolyn Scott-Adams. (vba)
October 7, 2019 Filing 17 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Danielle Cara Newman on behalf of H&M. (Newman, Danielle)
September 30, 2019 Filing 16 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Notice of Motion to Dismiss; Notice Pursuant to Local Rule 12.1; Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss; Declaration of Kenneth D. Friedman; Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement; and Unreported Cases pursuant to Local Rule 7.2 served on Gwendolyn A. Scott-Adams on 9/30/2019. Service was made by FedEx. Document filed by H&M. (Friedman, Kenneth)
September 30, 2019 Filing 15 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent H & M HENNES & MAURITZ HOLDING B.V., Corporate Parent H & M Hennes & Mauritz USA B.V., Corporate Parent H & M Hennes & Mauritz, AB for H&M. Document filed by H&M.(Friedman, Kenneth)
September 30, 2019 Filing 14 NOTICE of Notice to Pro Se Litigant Pursuant to Local Rule 12.1 re: #11 MOTION to Dismiss .. Document filed by H&M. (Friedman, Kenneth)
September 30, 2019 Filing 13 DECLARATION of Kenneth D. Friedman in Support re: #11 MOTION to Dismiss .. Document filed by H&M. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint)(Friedman, Kenneth)
September 30, 2019 Filing 12 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #11 MOTION to Dismiss . . Document filed by H&M. (Friedman, Kenneth)
September 30, 2019 Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss . Document filed by H&M.(Friedman, Kenneth)
September 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER: Initial Conference set for 10/29/2019 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 20D, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 9/4/2019) (kv)
August 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 INFORMATION PACKAGE MAILED to Gwendolyn Scott-Adams, at 121 E. 182nd Street Apt. 202 Bronx, NY 10453, on 8/29/2019 Re: #6 Mediation Referral Order for Pro Se Employment Discrimination Cases, #8 Order of Service, via REGULAR MAIL. The following document(s) were enclosed in the Service Package: a copy of the order of service or order to answer and other orders entered to date, a copy of the Mediation Referral Order for Pro Se Employment Discrimination Cases, the individual practices of the district judge and magistrate judge assigned to your case, Instructions for Litigants Who Do Not Have Attorneys, Notice Regarding Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Case Files, a flyer about the free legal assistance clinic located in the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse (only in non prisoner cases), a Motions guide, a notice that the Pro Se Manual has been discontinued, a Notice of Change of Address form to use if your contact information changes, a handout explaining matters handled by magistrate judges and consent form to complete if all parties agree to proceed for all purposes before the magistrate judge, a form for you to complete if you consent to receive filings electronically (only in nonprisoner cases). (bwa)
August 29, 2019 SUMMONS ISSUED as to H&M. (bwa)
August 29, 2019 FRCP 4 SERVICE PACKAGE HAND DELIVERED TO U.S.M.: on 8/29/2019 Re: Judge George B. Daniels #8 Order of Service. The following document(s) were enclosed in the Service Package: Summons, IFP, Order of Service, Completed U.S.M. form(s) for defendant(s)H&M. (bwa)
August 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER OF SERVICE: The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, together with an information package. The Court dismisses Plaintiff's claims against Andrew L. Satenberg, Esq., Partner. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).The Clerk of Court is further instructed to complete the USM-285 forms with the address for H&M and deliver all documents necessary to effect service to the U.S. Marshals Service. The Clerk of Court is directed to docket this as a "written opinion" within the meaning of Section 205( a)(5) of the E-Government Act of 2002. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. (Andrew L. Satenberg, Esq (Partner) terminated.) (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 8/27/2019) (rro) Transmission to Pro Se Assistants for processing.
August 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for General Pretrial (includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement) and Dispositive Motion (i.e., motion requiring a Report and Recommendation Referred to Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 8/27/2019) (rro)
August 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEDIATION REFERRAL ORDER FOR PRO SE EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CASES: IT IS ORDERED that this prose case is referred for mediation to the Court's Mediation Program. Local Civil Rule 83.9 and the Mediation Program Procedures shall govern the mediation. Unless otherwise ordered, the mediation will have no effect upon any scheduling order issued by this Court, and all parties are obligated to continue to litigate the case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall attempt to locate pro bono counsel to represent Plaintiff at the mediation. Pro bono counsel will contact Plaintiff directly. The time to assign a mediator under Local Civil Rule 83.9 and the Court's Mediation Program Procedures will be deferred until pro bono counsel has filed a Notice of Limited Appearance of Pro Bono Counsel. Pro bono counsel will represent Plaintiff solely for purposes of the mediation, and that representation will terminate at the conclusion of the mediation process. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any objection by Plaintiff either to the mediation or to the Court's request for pro bono counsel to represent Plaintiff in the mediation must be filed within 14 days of this order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 8/27/2019q) (rro)
August 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PRO SE PRETRIAL: Pro se Plaintiff and counsel for all parties are hereby notified that this case is referred to Magistrate Ona T. Wang for the purposes of Case Management and Scheduling pursuant to Federal Rule Civil Procedure 16. You are directed to furnish all attorneys in this action with copies of this order and enclosures. If you are unaware of the identity of counsel for any of the parties, you must send a copy of the notice and rules to that party personally. All correspondence to the Court should be addressed to the chambers of Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang and submitted to the Pro Se Intake Unit, located in the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, New York 10007 telephone (212) 805-0175.Any procedural questions by Pro Se plaintiff should be addressed to the Office of Pro Se Intake Unit at (212) 805-0175. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 8/27/2019) (rro)
August 27, 2019 Mailed a copy of #3 Order Granting IFP Application to Gwendolyn Scott-Adams 121 E. 182nd Street Apt. 202 Bronx, NY 10453. (vba)
August 27, 2019 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge George B. Daniels. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (bcu)
August 27, 2019 Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (bcu)
August 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. 28 U.S.C. 1915. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 8/26/2019) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
August 22, 2019 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against H&M, Andrew L. Satenberg, Esq. Document filed by Gwendolyn Scott-Adams. (sac)
August 22, 2019 Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Gwendolyn Scott-Adams.(sac)
August 22, 2019 Case Designated ECF. (sac)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scott-Adams v. H&M et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew L. Satenberg, Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: H&M
Represented By: Danielle Cara Newman
Represented By: Kenneth David Friedman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gwendolyn Scott-Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?