Thomas v. Republic of Argentina
| Anna Thomas |
| The Republic of Argentina and Republic of Argentina |
| 1:2019cv08238 |
| September 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Loretta A Preska |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 fs |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL: NOW, THEREFORE, plaintiff, by her attorneys Smith Gambrell & Russell LLP, and the Republic, by its attorneys Cleary Gotllieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE THAT: 1. The Complaint in the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed pursuant toFederal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) with prejudice and without costs. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this action closed and all pending motions denied as moot. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 12/5/2019) (mml)
|
| Filing 10 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Republic of Argentina. (Boccuzzi, Carmine) |
|
Filing 9
STIPULATION AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN the undersigned counsel as follows: 1. The undersigned parties agree that the above-captioned case should be stayed until December 13, 2019. 2. On or before December 3, 2019, the undersigned parties will meet and confer, in good faith, to determine whether a stay for an additional period of time will be requested from the Court. 3. If the undersigned parties elect to ask the Court to stay the case for an additional period, the stay shall continue and the parties shall promptly file a stipulation seeking such relief. 4. The provisions in Paragraphs 2 and 3 above are without prejudice to one or more of the undersigned parties asking the Court to stay the action for an additional period of time, even if one or more of the undersigned parties does not consent to that relief. 5. If the undersigned parties do not stipulate to ask the Court to extend the stay and if no stay is granted upon the request of fewer than all of the undersigned parties, the Republic will have until December 13, 2019 to answer, move to dismiss or otherwise respond to the Complaint. SO ORDERED. Case stayed. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 11/13/2019) (mml)
|
| Filing 8 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Republic of Argentina. (Boccuzzi, Carmine) |
| Filing 7 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Republic of Argentina. (Boccuzzi, Carmine) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by John Gerard McCarthy, Sr on behalf of Anna Thomas. (McCarthy, John) |
| CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 1:16-cv-00991-LAP. Notice of Assignment to follow. (wb) |
| Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (wb) |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Loretta A. Preska. Judge George B. Daniels is no longer assigned to the case. (wb) |
| Filing 5 LETTER addressed to Judge George B. Daniels from Carmine D. Boccuzzi dated September 11, 2019 re: alerting court of potentially related action. Document filed by Republic of Argentina.(Boccuzzi, Carmine) |
|
Filing 4
INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 1/9/2020 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 11A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge George B. Daniels, as further set forth in this order. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 9/5/2019) (jwh)
|
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge George B. Daniels. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (pne) |
| Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pne) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pne) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Carmine D. Boccuzzi, Jr. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code XX Out of U.S.. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to New York. (pne) |
| Filing 3 STATEMENT OF RELATEDNESS re: that this action be filed as related to 06-cv-9976 (LAP), etc. (see Schedule A for complete list). Document filed by The Republic of Argentina.(Boccuzzi, Carmine) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Boccuzzi, Carmine) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York. Case Number: 656403/2018. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-17541726).Document filed by The Republic of Argentina. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint (Part 1), #2 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint (Part 2), #3 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint (Part 3), #4 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint (Part 4))(Boccuzzi, Carmine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
