Internet Media Interactive Corp. v. Shutterfly, Inc.
Plaintiff: Internet Media Interactive Corp.
Defendant: Shutterfly, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2019cv08313
Filed: September 6, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Lorna G Schofield
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 24, 2019 Filing 13 AO 120 FORM PATENT - CASE TERMINATED - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 290, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a final decision was rendered on 10/24/2019 in a court action filed on the following patent(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (km)
October 24, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice and without costs against the defendant(s) Shutterfly, Inc.. Document filed by Internet Media Interactive Corp.. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers).. (Haller, Timothy)
September 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Application GRANTED. Defendant shall respond to the Complaint by November 1, 2019. Shutterfly, Inc. answer due 11/1/2019 (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 9/27/2019) (cf)
September 25, 2019 Filing 10 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Lorna G. Schofield from Timothy J. Haller dated 09/25/2019. Document filed by Internet Media Interactive Corp..(Haller, Timothy)
September 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: Initial Conference set for 11/5/2019 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 1106, Thurgood Marshal Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Lorna G. Schofield. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 9/20/2019) (cf)
September 18, 2019 Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. Shutterfly, Inc. served on 9/11/2019, answer due 10/2/2019. Service was accepted by Shutterfly, Inc. c/o - Registered Agent - Corporation Service Company. Document filed by Internet Media Interactive Corp.. (Haller, Timothy)
September 10, 2019 Case Eligible for Patent Pilot Program. (pne)
September 9, 2019 Filing 7 AO 120 FORM PATENT - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 290, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following patent(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (pne)
September 9, 2019 Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Shutterfly, Inc.. (pne)
September 9, 2019 Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pne)
September 9, 2019 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Lorna G. Schofield. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (pne)
September 9, 2019 Case Designated ECF. (pne)
September 6, 2019 Filing 5 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Internet Media Interactive Corp..(Haller, Timothy)
September 6, 2019 Filing 4 AO 120 FORM PATENT - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark for case opening submitted to court for review.(Haller, Timothy)
September 6, 2019 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Shutterfly, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Internet Media Interactive Corp.. (Haller, Timothy)
September 6, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Haller, Timothy)
September 6, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Shutterfly, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-17555606)Document filed by Internet Media Interactive Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Haller, Timothy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Internet Media Interactive Corp. v. Shutterfly, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shutterfly, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Internet Media Interactive Corp.
Represented By: Timothy J. Haller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?