In re: Dwayne Anderson
| Dwayne Anderson |
| John Doe |
| 1:2019cv08322 |
| September 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Colleen McMahon |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Mailed a copy of #2 Order of Dismissal, #3 Judgment - Sua Sponte (Complaint), Notice of Appeal Forms, to Dwayne Anderson ID No. 124529 AMSI Morgan County Correctional Complex 541 Wayne Cotton Morgan Drive Wartburg, TN 37887. (vba) |
Filing 3
CIVIL JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this action is dismissed without prejudice under the Prison Litigation Reform Act's filing bar. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Plaintiff continues to be barred from filing any federal civil action under the in forma pauperis (IFP) statute while he is a prisoner unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this judgment to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 10/21/2019) (Attachments: #1 Pro Se Appeal Package) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1915(g): The Court directs the Clerk of Court to assign this matter to my docket, mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, and note service on the docket. The Court dismisses this action without prejudice under the PLRA's filing bar. 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Plaintiff remains barred from filing any future federal civil action IFP while he is a prisoner, unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 10/21/2019) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| Transmission to Office of the Clerk of Court. Transmitted re: #2 Order of Dismissal, to the Office of the Clerk of Court for processing. (sac) |
| NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Colleen McMahon. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (sac) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Doe. Document filed by Dwayne Anderson.(rdz) |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: In re: Dwayne Anderson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dwayne Anderson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: John Doe | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
