Graham et al v. Revolution Lighting Technologies, Inc. et al
| Patrick Graham and Wendy Graham |
| Robert V. Lapenta, Charles J. Schafer, Revolution Lighting Technologies, Inc. and James A. DePalma |
| 1:2019cv08337 |
| September 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| J Paul Oetken |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: All parties to the above-captioned action, by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of the Complaint. The parties shall bear their own fees and costs incurred in the prosecution or defense of the above-referenced causes of action. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 9/16/2020) (js)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) James A. DePalma, Robert V. Lapenta, Revolution Lighting Technologies, Inc., Charles J. Schafer and without costs. Document filed by Patrick Graham, Wendy Graham. Proposed Order to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff...(Kim, Phillip) |
| ***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. #8 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal was reviewed and referred to Judge J. Paul Oetken for approval for the following reason(s): the stipulation of dismissal is not pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (km) |
| Filing 7 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) James A. DePalma, Robert V. Lapenta, Revolution Lighting Technologies, Inc., Charles J. Schafer and without costs pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Patrick Graham, Wendy Graham. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Kim, Phillip) Modified on 9/15/2020 (km). |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL. Notice to Attorney Phillip Kim. RE-FILE Document No. #7 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Your document and the docket entry do not match. Refile your document and do no select that the document is pursuant to Rule 41(a), your document does not state that it is. Re-file the document using the event type Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal found under the event list Other Documents - select the correct filer/filers - select the correct party/parties the voluntary dismissal is against - and attach the correct signed PDF. (km) |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge J. Paul Oetken. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (wb) |
| Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (wb) |
| CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 1:19-cv-00980-JPO. Notice of Assignment to follow. (wb) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE. Revolution Lighting Technologies, Inc. served on 9/9/2019, answer due 9/30/2019. Service was accepted by Lyanne Gares, Managing Agent. Document filed by Patrick Graham; Wendy Graham. (Kim, Phillip) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to James A. DePalma, Robert V. Lapenta, Revolution Lighting Technologies, Inc., Charles J. Schafer. (dnh) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Unassigned. (dnh) |
| Case Designated ECF. (dnh) |
| CASE REFERRED TO Judge J. Paul Oetken as possibly related to 1:19-cv-00980-JPO. (dnh) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Revolution Lighting Technologies, Inc., Robert V. LaPenta, Charles J. Schafer, and James A. DePalma, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Patrick Graham, Wendy Graham. (Kim, Phillip) |
| Filing 3 STATEMENT OF RELATEDNESS re: that this action be filed as related to 19-cv-980 (JPO). Document filed by Patrick Graham, Wendy Graham.(Kim, Phillip) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Kim, Phillip) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against James A. DePalma, Robert V. Lapenta, Revolution Lighting Technologies, Inc., Charles J. Schafer. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-17558087)Document filed by Patrick Graham, Wendy Graham.(Kim, Phillip) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
