Romero v. Herrick et al
Loretta Romero |
Visualhouse USA LLC, Visualhouse Los Angeles, Corp. and Robert M. Herrick |
1:2019cv08363 |
September 9, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Ronnie Abrams |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 lr |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER granting #14 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. Application granted. The initial status conference is rescheduled for 10:45 a.m. on December 6, 2019. SO ORDERED. Initial Conference set for 12/6/2019 at 10:45 AM before Judge Ronnie Abrams. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 9/18/2019) (kv) |
Filing 14 FIRST LETTER MOTION to Adjourn Conference addressed to Judge Ronnie Abrams from Scott Caplan dated 09/18/2019. Document filed by Loretta Romero.(Caplan, Scott) |
Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Visualhouse Los Angeles, Corp. waiver sent on 9/13/2019, answer due 11/12/2019. Document filed by Loretta Romero. (Caplan, Scott) |
Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Visualhouse USA LLC waiver sent on 9/13/2019, answer due 11/12/2019. Document filed by Loretta Romero. (Caplan, Scott) |
Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Robert M. Herrick waiver sent on 9/13/2019, answer due 11/12/2019. Document filed by Loretta Romero. (Caplan, Scott) |
Filing 10 ORDER AND NOTICE OF INITIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 11/22/2019 at 02:15 PM in Courtroom 1506, 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Ronnie Abrams. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 9/11/2019) (rj) |
Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Visualhouse Los Angeles, Corp.. (dnh) |
Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Visualhouse USA LLC. (dnh) |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Robert M. Herrick. (dnh) |
Filing 6 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Visualhouse Los Angeles, Corp., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Loretta Romero. (Caplan, Scott) |
Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Visualhouse USA LLC, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Loretta Romero. (Caplan, Scott) |
Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Robert M. Herrick, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Loretta Romero. (Caplan, Scott) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Spencer Garrett Scharff on behalf of Loretta Romero. (Scharff, Spencer) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Ronnie Abrams. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (pne) |
Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pne) |
Case Designated ECF. (pne) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Caplan, Scott) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Robert M. Herrick, Visualhouse Los Angeles, Corp., Visualhouse USA LLC. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-17566148)Document filed by Loretta Romero.(Caplan, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.