Ottah v. Verizon Services Corp.
| Chikezie Ottah |
| Varizone Inc. and Verizon Services Corp |
| 1:2019cv08552 |
| September 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Lorna G Schofield |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1338 pt |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Notice of Motion to Dismiss, Local Civil Rule 12 Notice, Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion, Declaration of Todd M. Nosher with Exhibit, Authorities provided to pro se Plaintiff pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.2, Verizons Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 Statement, Certificate of Service served on Chikezie Ottah on November 11, 2019. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Verizon Services Corp. (Nosher, Todd) |
| Filing 17 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Verizon Communications Inc. for Verizon Services Corp. Document filed by Verizon Services Corp.(Nosher, Todd) |
| Filing 16 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #13 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. O. 12(B)(1) and 12(B)6). . Document filed by Verizon Services Corp. (Nosher, Todd) |
| Filing 15 DECLARATION of Todd M. Nosher in Support re: #13 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. O. 12(B)(1) and 12(B)6).. Document filed by Verizon Services Corp. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Nosher, Todd) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Local Civil Rule 12.1 re: #13 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. O. 12(B)(1) and 12(B)6).. Document filed by Verizon Services Corp. (Nosher, Todd) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. O. 12(B)(1) and 12(B)6). Document filed by Verizon Services Corp.(Nosher, Todd) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Ralph A. Dengler on behalf of Verizon Services Corp. (Dengler, Ralph) |
| Filing 11 LETTER addressed to Judge Lorna G. Schofield from Todd M. Nosher, Esq. dated November 1, 2019 re: Motion to Dismiss the Complaint. Document filed by Verizon Services Corp.(Nosher, Todd) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Complaint, served. Verizon Services Corp served on 10/4/2019, answer due 10/25/2019. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Chikezie Ottah. (sc) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Application GRANTED. Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by November 11, 2019. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to amend the Defendant of record and in the caption to "Verizon Services Corp.," in light of pro se Plaintiff's spelling error. Varizone Inc. answer due 11/11/2019. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 10/7/2019) (cf)
|
| Filing 8 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Lorna G. Schofield from Todd M. Nosher dated October 4, 2019. Document filed by Varizone Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Nosher, Todd) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER denying without prejudice #6 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. This application is denied without prejudice to renewal before Judge Schofield as she has not referred this case to me for general pretrial supervision or otherwise. It should thus be directed to Judge Schofield. (HEREBY ORDERED by Magistrate Judge James L. Cott)(Text Only Order) Copies of Notice of Electronic Filing To Be Mailed By Clerks Office. (Cott, James)
|
| Filing 6 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint addressed to Magistrate Judge James L. Cott from Todd M. Nosher dated October 4, 2019. Document filed by Varizone Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Nosher, Todd) |
| Mailed a copy of 7 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, to Chikezie Ottah 648 Dorothea Lane Elmont, NY 11003. (vba) |
| Mailed a copy of #5 Order for Initial Pretrial Conference, Motion for Permission for Electronic Case Filing, and Pro Se (Nonprisoner) Consent & Registration Form to Receive Documents Electronically to Chikezie Ottah 648 Dorothea Lane Elmont, NY 11003. (aea) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Initial Conference set for 11/21/2019 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 1106, Thurgood Marshal Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Lorna G. Schofield. The clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to the pro se Plaintiff. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 9/20/2019) (cf) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| Case Eligible for Patent Pilot Program. (sac) |
| Filing 3 AO 120 FORM PATENT - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 290, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following patent(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (sac) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (sac) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Varizone Inc. (Filing Fee $400.00, Receipt Number 465401243993) Document filed by Chikezie Ottah. (sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Varizone Inc. (sac) |
| Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
