Securities and Exchange Commission v. Simeo
Securities & Exchange Commission and Securities and Exchange Commission |
Tom Simeo |
1:2019cv08621 |
September 17, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Paul G Gardephe |
Securities/Commodities |
15 U.S.C. ยง 77 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTICE OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 2/20/2020 at 10:15 AM in Courtroom 705, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Paul G. Gardephe. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 11/1/2019) (jca) |
Filing 6 ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE granting #5 MOTION for Stephan Jacob Schlegelmilch to Appear Pro Hac Vice. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 9/27/2019) (jca) |
>>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #5 MOTION for Stephan Jacob Schlegelmilch to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Stephan Jacob Schlegelmilch to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Schlegelmilch, Stephan) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Tom Simeo. (jgo) |
Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (jgo) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney John David Worland, Jr.. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Jurisdiction code 3 (Federal Question); Arbitration code e (Exempt);. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Jurisdiction code has been modified to 1 (U.S. Government Plaintiff); the Arbitration code has been deleted;. (jgo) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney John David Worland, Jr.. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Securities and Exchange Commission; Tom Simeo. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name contained a typographical error; party role was entered incorrectly;. (jgo) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Paul G. Gardephe. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (jgo) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Tom Simeo, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Securities & Exchange Commission. (Worland, John) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Worland, John) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tom Simeo. Document filed by Securities & Exchange Commission.(Worland, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.