Melwani v. XYZ Entity et al
| Prakash Melwani |
| XYZ Entity, John/Jane Doe and New 32 America, Inc. d/b/a Nature Republic |
| 1:2019cv08628 |
| September 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Stewart D Aaron |
| Valerie E Caproni |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 44 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT NEW 32 AMERICA, INC. d/b/a NATURE REPUBLIC. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the respective parties in this action, that the time for Defendant New 32 America, Inc. d/b/a Nature Republic, to Answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Prakash Melwani and served on Defendant New 32 America, Inc. d/b/a Nature Republic on or about November 1, 2019, shall be and is hereby extended to and including November 22, 2019. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this Stipulation may be signed in counterparts and a facsimile or PDF copy of a signature shall be sufficient for all purposes. So ordered. New 32 America, Inc. d/b/a Nature Republic answer due 11/22/2019. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron on 11/8/2019) (rjm)
|
| Filing 13 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by New 32 America, Inc. d/b/a Nature Republic. (Rosenblatt, Raphael) |
| Mailed a copy of #12 Order for Initial Pretrial Conference, to Prakash Melwani 101 W 23RD St Suite 163 New York, NY 10011. (vba) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER SCHEDULING INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: An Initial Pretrial Conference in accordance with Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will be held on Tuesday, December 10, 2019 at 11:30 a.m. in Courtroom 11C, United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007. If any party needs to change the date of the conference, that party must make the request, by letter, as soon as the need for a different date is known. (Initial Conference set for 12/10/2019 at 11:30 AM in Courtroom 11C, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron on 11/6/2019) (kl) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| Filing 11 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; re: amending #2 Complaint against John/Jane Doe, New 32 America, Inc. d/b/a Nature Republic with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Prakash Melwani. Related document: #2 Complaint.(sc) |
|
Filing 10
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT NEW 32 AMERICA, INC. (IMPROPERLY IDENTIFIED AS "XYZ ENTITY d/b/a NATURE REPUBLIC"): It is hereby stipulated and agreed, by and between the respective parties in this action, that the time for Defendant New 32 America, Inc., improperly identified in the Complaint as "XYZ Entity d/b/a Nature Republic" to Answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint filed by Plaintiff Prakash Melwani shall be and is hereby extended to and including November 13, 2019. So Ordered. XYZ Entity answer due 11/13/2019. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron on 10/8/2019) (js)
|
| Filing 9 CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #2 Complaint Until November 13, 2019. Document filed by XYZ Entity.(Rosenblatt, Raphael) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Raphael Mark Rosenblatt on behalf of XYZ Entity. (Rosenblatt, Raphael) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Complaint served. XYZ Entity served on 9/23/2019, answer due 10/15/2019. Service was accepted by Min Jae Lee, Manager. Document filed by Prakash Melwani. (sc) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER OF REFERENCE TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for General Pretrial (includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement) and Dispositive Motion (i.e., motion requiring a Report and Recommendation). All such Motion. Referred to Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 9/30/2019) (ama)
|
| ***DELETED DOCUMENT. Deleted document number #7 NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. The document was incorrectly filed in this case. (ama) |
| Filing 4 AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 15 U.S.C. 1116, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following trademark(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (rdz) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: Prakash Melwani consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by Prakash Melwani.(rdz) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against John/Jane Doe, XYZ Entity. (Filing Fee $ $400.00, Receipt Number 465401244123)Document filed by Prakash Melwani.(rdz) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (rdz) |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to John/Jane Doe, XYZ Entity. (rdz) |
| Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
