Trump v. Vance, Jr. et al
Plaintiff: Donald J. Trump
Defendant: Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. and Mazars USA, LLP
Case Number: 1:2019cv08694
Filed: September 19, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Victor Marrero
Nature of Suit: Constitutional - State Statute
Cause of Action: 28:1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 19, 2019 Set/Reset Hearings: Oral Argument set for 9/25/2019 at 09:30 AM before Judge Victor Marrero. (jwh)
September 19, 2019 Filing 4 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Victor Marrero from Christopher Conroy dated [undated] re: the parties have agreed to the following schedule subject to the Court's approval. ENDORSEMENT: Request GRANTED. The briefing schedule and hearing on the motion for injunctive relief in this action shall be as set forth above. (Mazars USA, LLP answer due 9/23/2019; Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. answer due 9/23/2019.) (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 9/19/2019) (jwh)
September 19, 2019 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #3 MOTION for William S. Consovoy to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-17626124. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
September 19, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION for William S. Consovoy to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-17626124. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Donald J. Trump. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing (VA), #3 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing (DC), #4 Text of Proposed Order)(Consovoy, William)
September 19, 2019 Case Designated ECF. (pc)
September 19, 2019 Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pc)
September 19, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (pc) (jgo).
September 19, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mazars USA, LLP, Cyrus R. Vance, Jr.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number 465401244444)Document filed by Donald J. Trump.(pc) (jgo).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Trump v. Vance, Jr. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donald J. Trump
Represented By: William Consovoy
Represented By: Patrick Strawbridge
Represented By: Marc Lee Mukasey
Represented By: Alan Samuel Futerfas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cyrus R. Vance, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mazars USA, LLP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?