Williams, Scott & Associates LLC et al v. United States of America
| John T. Williams, WSA, LLC and Williams, Scott & Associates LLC |
| United States of America |
| 1:2019cv08736 |
| September 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Colleen McMahon |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Mailed a copy of #6 Order 30 Days Other (case opening), to John T. Williams 437 Kendrick Est Dr. Jonesboro, GA 30238; Williams, Scott & Associates LLC 437 Kendrick Est Dr. Jonesboro, GA 30238; WSA, LLC 437 Kendrick Est Dr. Jonesboro, GA 30238. (vba) |
Filing 6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket, mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, and note service on the docket. Plaintiff is directed to show cause why his FTCA claim should not be dismissed as untimely. Plaintiff must submit a declaration to this Court's Pro Se Intake Unit within thirty days of the date of this order, and label the document with docket number 19-CV-8736 (CM). No summons will issue at this time. If Plaintiff fails to comply within the time allowed, and he cannot show good cause to excuse such failure, the complaint will be dismissed for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to docket this as a "written opinion" within the meaning of Section 205(a)(5) of the E-Government Act of 2002. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 11/12/2019) (mro) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Colleen McMahon. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (mro) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. 28 U.S.C. 1915. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 10/28/2019) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| Mailed a copy of #4 Order Granting IFP Application to WSA, LLC 437 Kendrick Est Dr. Jonesboro, GA 30238; Williams, Scott & Associates LLC 437 Kendrick Est Dr. Jonesboro, GA 30238; John T. Williams 437 Kendrick Est Dr. Jonesboro, GA 30238. (vba) |
| Filing 5 LETTER from John T. Williams, dated 10/17/19 re: Plaintiff writes to the Court that, as he writes this letter, his case has not had a judge assigned to it; and that he would like to know why. Document filed by John T. Williams.(sc) |
| Filing 3 LETTER from John T. Williams dated 9/14/2019 re: I was told I was barred under the "three strikes" provision of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. 1915 (g), from filing any federal civil action forma pauperis while a prisoner unless I'm in imminent danger. Document filed by John T. Williams.(rdz) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against United States of America. Document filed by John T. Williams, Williams, Scott & Associates LLC, WSA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(rdz) Modified on 10/7/2019 (sac). |
| Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by John T. Williams.(rdz) |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
