Ruiz v. SEIU. Local 32BJ et al
| Jesus Maria Cano Ruiz |
| Edo Mehmedovic, Solil Management LLC, Vivian Orellana, Scott Price, SEIU. Local 32BJ, SOL Goldman Investments, LLC, Sara Appel and Martin Ball |
| 1:2019cv08810 |
| September 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Paul A Engelmayer |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT against Sara Appel, Martin Ball, Edo Mehmedovic, Vivian Orellana, Scott Price, SEIU. Local 32BJ, SOL Goldman Investments, LLC, Solil Management LLC. (Filing Fee $ $400.00, Receipt Number 465401244707)Document filed by Jesus Maria Cano Ruiz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(rdz)
|
|
Filing 1
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (rdz)
|
|
Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (rdz)
|
|
Case Designated ECF. (rdz)
|
|
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Sara Appel, Martin Ball, Edo Mehmedovic, Vivian Orellana, Scott Price, SEIU. Local 32BJ, SOL Goldman Investments, LLC, Solil Management LLC. (rdz)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
