Banks v. United States of America et al
| Frederick Banks |
| Environmental Protection Agency, Central Intelligence Agency, All United Nations Member Countries, U.S. Marshals Service, Warden and United States of America |
| 1:2019cv08829 |
| September 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Colleen McMahon |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Appeal Record Sent to USCA (Electronic File). Certified Indexed record on Appeal Electronic Files for #5 Notice of Appeal filed by Frederick Banks were transmitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (tp) |
| Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Certified Copy of Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re: #5 Notice of Appeal. (tp) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEAL from #3 Order of Dismissal, #4 Judgment - Sua Sponte (Petition). Document filed by Frederick Banks. Form D-P is due within 14 days to the Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. (Attachments: #1 Motion for IFP, #2 Other) (tp) |
| Appeal Fee Due: for #5 Notice of Appeal. Appeal fee due by 11/14/2019. (tp) |
| Appeal Remark as to #5 Notice of Appeal filed by Frederick Banks. IFP DENIED 10/07/2019. (tp) |
Filing 4
CIVIL JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the petition is dismissed for lack of standing and as frivolous. Because the petition makes no substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue under 28 U.S.C. 2253. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this judgment to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 10/7/2019) (Attachments: #1 Pro Se Appeal Package) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Clerk is directed to assign this matter to my docket, mail a copy of this order to Petitioner Banks, and note service on the docket. The petition is dismissed for lack of standing and as frivolous. Because the petition makes no substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. 2253. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to docket this as a "written opinion" within the meaning of Section 205(a)(5) of the E-Government Act of 2002. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 10/7/2019) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| Mailed a copy of #3 Order of Dismissal, #4 Judgment - Sua Sponte (Petition), Notice of Appeal Forms, to Frederick Banks 120759 Allegheny Coutny Jail 950 Second Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15219. (vba) |
| NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Colleen McMahon. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (sac) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER AUTHORIZATION/IFP. Document filed by Frederick Banks.(rdz) Modified on 9/24/2019 (rdz). |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. Document filed by Frederick Banks.(rdz) Modified on 9/24/2019 (rdz). |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) Modified on 9/24/2019 (rdz). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
