SoMo Audience Corporation v. Verve Wireless, Inc.
| SoMo Audience Corp. and SoMo Audience Corporation |
| Verve Wireless, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv08862 |
| September 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Alvin K Hellerstein |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Verve Wireless, Inc.. (dnh) |
| Filing 7 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Verve Wireless, Inc., re: #5 Complaint. Document filed by SoMo Audience Corporation. (Robins, Bruce) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Bruce Ethan Robins to RE-FILE Document No. #6 Request for Issuance of Summons. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF attached to the docket entry for the issuance of summons is not correct; the caption on the summons PDF must exactly match the caption on the pleading. Do not use abbreviations. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (dnh) |
| Filing 6 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - SUMMONS REQUEST PDF ERROR - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Verve Wireless, Inc., re: #5 Complaint. Document filed by SoMo Audience Corporation. (Robins, Bruce) Modified on 9/27/2019 (dnh). |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (pc) |
| Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pc) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Bruce Ethan Robins to RE-FILE Document No. #4 Request for Issuance of Summons. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): The summons requested was linked to the incorrectly filed Complaint. Refile and link it to the correctly filed Complaint (document 5);. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Bruce Ethan Robins. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Cause of Action code 15:294; Nature of Suit code 150 (Contract: Recovery/Enforcement); County code New York; Fee Status code due (due);. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Cause of Action code has been modified to 28:1332; the Nature of Suit code has been modified to 190 (Contract: Other); the County code has been modified to XX Out of State; the Fee Status code has been modified to pd (paid);. (pc) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Verve Wireless, Inc.. Document filed by SoMo Audience Corporation.(Robins, Bruce) |
| Filing 4 FILING ERROR SUMMONS NOT LINKED TO CORRESPONDING PLEADING- REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Verve Wireless, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by SoMo Audience Corp.. (Robins, Bruce) Modified on 9/26/2019 (pc). |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Robins, Bruce) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Bruce Ethan Robins. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: SoMo Audience Corp.. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name contained a typographical error;. (pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Bruce Ethan Robins to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Complaint. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF attached to the docket entry for the pleading is not correct; Document is titled draft. Court name caption is incorrect. Re-file the pleading using the event type Complaint found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. If the deficiency/deficiencies are not corrected within five (5) days per Amended Standing Order 15-mc-00131 this case will be administratively closed. Initial Pleading due by 9/30/2019. (pc) |
| Filing 2 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by SoMo Audience Corp. (Robins, Bruce) Modified on 9/26/2019 (db). As per ecf_error email correspondence received on 9/25/2019 @ 10:15am. |
| Filing 1 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - PDF ERROR - COMPLAINT against Verve Wireless, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-17655841)Document filed by SoMo Audience Corp..(Robins, Bruce) Modified on 9/25/2019 (pc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
