Phyto Tech Corp. v. Givaudan SA
| Phyto Tech Corp. Doing Buisness As Blue California and Phyto Tech Corp. |
| Givaudan SA |
| 1:2019cv09033 |
| September 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| John G Koeltl |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 27
LETTER MOTION for Oral Argument addressed to Judge John G. Koeltl from Katherine A. Helm dated November 25, 2019. Document filed by Phyto Tech Corp..(Helm, Katherine)
|
|
Filing 26
PROPOSED ORDER. Document filed by Phyto Tech Corp.. Related Document Number: #24 . (Helm, Katherine) Proposed Order to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.
|
|
Filing 25
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #24 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant's Counterclaim. (Redacted). Document filed by Phyto Tech Corp.. (Helm, Katherine)
|
|
Filing 24
MOTION to Dismiss Defendant's Counterclaim. Document filed by Phyto Tech Corp..(Helm, Katherine)
|
|
Filing 23
ORDER granting #22 Letter Motion for Leave to File Document. APPLICATION GRANTED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 11/25/2019) (ks)
|
|
Filing 22
LETTER MOTION for Leave to File Motion to Dismiss Givaudan's Counterclaim Under Partial Seal as a Redacted Document. addressed to Judge John G. Koeltl from Katherine A. Helm dated November 22, 2019. Document filed by Phyto Tech Corp..(Helm, Katherine)
|
|
Filing 21
ORDER: The parties agree that a liquidating trustee should be appointed. The plaintiff has submitted a proposed order (Dkt. No. 19). The defendant should respond to the order by November 25, 2019. The plaintiff should reply by December 6, 2019. The plaintiff may move to dismiss the counterclaim by November 25, 2019. The defendant should respond by December 6, 2019. The plaintiff should reply by December 16, 2019. (Motions due by 11/25/2019. Responses due by 12/6/2019. Replies due by 12/16/2019.) (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 11/13/2019) (rro)
|
|
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge John G. Koeltl: Pre-Motion Conference held on 11/13/2019. (Chan, Tsz)
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER granting #18 Letter Motion for Conference. A conference will be held on Wednesday, November 13, 2019, at 4:30 PM. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 10/28/2019) Pre-Motion Conference set for 11/13/2019 at 04:30 PM before Judge John G. Koeltl. (ks)
|
|
***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING PROPOSED ORDER. Document No. #19 Proposed Order was reviewed and approved as to form. (km)
|
|
Filing 19
PROPOSED ORDER. Document filed by Phyto Tech Corp.. Related Document Number: #18 . (Helm, Katherine) Proposed Order to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.
|
|
Filing 18
LETTER MOTION for Conference , Pre-Motion Conference. addressed to Judge John G. Koeltl from Katherine A. Helm dated October 25, 2019. Document filed by Phyto Tech Corp..(Helm, Katherine)
|
|
Filing 17
SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault.(mhe)
|
|
Filing 16
ANSWER to #1 Complaint,., COUNTERCLAIM against Phyto Tech Corp.. Document filed by Givaudan SA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit UN-REDACTED BGN LLC AGREEMENT (sealed))(Pitman, Ryan)
|
|
Filing 15
FIRST RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Givaudan SA.(Pitman, Ryan)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Leave to File Document. APPLICATION GRANTED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 10/23/2019) (ks)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE granting #9 Motion for Martin J. Black to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 10/22/2019) (ks)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Christopher John Belter on behalf of Givaudan SA. (Belter, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 11
LETTER MOTION for Leave to File Response to Complaint under partial seal as a redacted document addressed to Judge John G. Koeltl from Ryan G. Pitman dated 10/21/2019. Document filed by Givaudan SA.(Pitman, Ryan)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Ryan Pitman on behalf of Givaudan SA. (Pitman, Ryan)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION for Martin J. Black to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-17796028. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Phyto Tech Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Martin J. Black, #2 Certificate of Good Standing PA, #3 Certificate of Good Standing NJ, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(Black, Martin)
|
|
>>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #9 MOTION for Martin J. Black to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-17796028. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
|
|
Filing 8
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint,. Givaudan SA served on 10/2/2019, answer due 12/2/2019. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Phyto Tech Corp.. (Helm, Katherine)
|
|
CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 1:18-cv-03588-JGK. Notice of Assignment to follow. (wb)
|
|
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge John G. Koeltl. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (wb)
|
|
Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (wb)
|
|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Givaudan SA. (sj)
|
|
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Katherine A. Helm. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code New York. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to XX Out of State. (sj)
|
|
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Katherine A. Helm. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Phyto Tech Corp.. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: alias party type was entered incorrectly. (sj)
|
|
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Unassigned. (sj)
|
|
CASE REFERRED TO Judge John G. Koeltl as possibly related to 1:18cv3588. (sj)
|
|
Case Designated ECF. (sj)
|
|
Filing 6
RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Other Affiliate SweeGen, Inc. for Phyto Tech Corp. Doing Buisness As Blue California. Document filed by Phyto Tech Corp. Doing Buisness As Blue California.(Helm, Katherine)
|
|
Filing 5
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Givaudan SA, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Phyto Tech Corp. Doing Buisness As Blue California. (Helm, Katherine)
|
|
Filing 4
STATEMENT OF RELATEDNESS re: that this action be filed as related to 1:18-cv-03588. Document filed by Phyto Tech Corp. Doing Buisness As Blue California.(Helm, Katherine)
|
|
Filing 3
STATEMENT OF RELATEDNESS re: that this action be filed as related to 1:18-cv-06172. Document filed by Phyto Tech Corp. Doing Buisness As Blue California.(Helm, Katherine)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Helm, Katherine)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Givaudan SA. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-17679423)Document filed by Phyto Tech Corp. Doing Buisness As Blue California. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Redacted LLC Agreement, #2 Exhibit B- Letter to CBelter)(Helm, Katherine)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
