Energizer Brands, LLC v. Duracell U.S. Operations, Inc.
Energizer Brands, LLC |
Duracell U.S. Operations, Inc. |
1:2019cv09061 |
September 30, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
J Paul Oetken |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 la |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Duracell U.S. Operations, Inc.. (pc) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge J. Paul Oetken. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (pc) |
Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pc) |
Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney William H. Brewster. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Cause of Action code blank;. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Cause of Action code has been modified to 15:1125;. (pc) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Richard Charles Henn, Jr on behalf of Energizer Brands, LLC. (Henn, Richard) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Bryan Jacob Wolin on behalf of Energizer Brands, LLC. (Wolin, Bryan) |
Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Duracell U.S. Operations, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Energizer Brands, LLC. (Brewster, William) |
Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Energizer Investment Company, Other Affiliate Energizer Holdings, Inc. for Energizer Brands, LLC. Document filed by Energizer Brands, LLC.(Brewster, William) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Brewster, William) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Duracell U.S. Operations, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-17687363)Document filed by Energizer Brands, LLC.(Brewster, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Energizer Brands, LLC v. Duracell U.S. Operations, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Energizer Brands, LLC | |
Represented By: | William H. Brewster |
Represented By: | Richard Charles Henn, Jr |
Represented By: | Bryan Jacob Wolin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Duracell U.S. Operations, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.