Cox v. Sing Sing Correctional Facility
| Michele Cox |
| Sing Sing Correctional Facility |
| 1:2019cv09249 |
| October 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Colleen McMahon |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 DECLARATION of Michele Cox in response to re: #4 Order Directing Original Signature. Document filed by Michele Cox. (sc) |
| Filing 5 APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS. Document filed by Michele Cox.(sc) |
Filing 4
ORDER DIRECTING ORIGINAL SIGNATURE: Plaintiff is directed to submit a signed declaration to this Court's Pro Se Office within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Signature Page due by 11/7/2019. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on October 8, 2019) (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(jjg) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEES OR IFP APPLICATION: Plaintiff is directed to render payment of the relevant fees or submit an IFP application to this Court's Pro Se Office within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).Fees due by 11/7/2019. In Forma Pauperis (IFP) Application due by 11/7/2019. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on October 8, 2019) (Attachments: #1 IFP Application)(jjg) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| Mailed a copy of #4 Order Directing Original Signature, to Michele Cox 6695 Princton Park Court Lithonia, GA 30058. (vba) |
| Mailed a copy of #3 Order Directing Payment of Fee or IFP Application, to Michele Cox 6695 Princton Park Court Lithonia, GA 30058. (vba) |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Colleen McMahon. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (wb) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (rdz) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sing Sing Correctional Facility. Document filed by Michele Cox.(rdz) |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cox v. Sing Sing Correctional Facility | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sing Sing Correctional Facility | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michele Cox | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
