Duke v. Carriage Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Craig Duke
Defendant: Carriage Services, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2019cv09307
Filed: October 8, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Lewis J Liman
Referring Judge: Lorna G Schofield
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER granting #21 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. The Court hereby ORDERS the following: 1. The Court is in receipt of a jointly-filed draft protective order (Dkt. No. 22), which the Court declines to execute at this time. 2. ORDERED that the Parties appear for a status conference on May 20, 2020 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 15C of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York. 3. The motion for Maria Biaggi to Withdraw as Attorney (Dkt. No. 21) is GRANTED for good cause, including that Defendants continue to be represented by attorneys Judith A. Archer and Nandini Rao of Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, who have appeared in this case. Docket Number 21 is terminated. SO ORDERED. Attorney Maria Biaggi terminated. (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 3/6/2020) (va) Modified on 3/9/2020 (va).
March 6, 2020 Set/Reset Hearings: Status Conference set for 5/20/2020 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 15C, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Lewis J. Liman. (va)
February 26, 2020 Filing 22 PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Document filed by Carriage Services, Inc...(Rao, Nandini)
February 24, 2020 Filing 21 MOTION for Maria Biaggi to Withdraw as Attorney . Document filed by Carriage Services, Inc...(Archer, Judith)
February 20, 2020 Filing 20 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Nandini Rao on behalf of Carriage Services, Inc...(Rao, Nandini)
February 4, 2020 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Lewis J. Liman. Judge Lorna G. Schofield is no longer assigned to the case..(wb)
February 3, 2020 Filing 19 JOINT LETTER addressed to Judge Lorna G. Schofield from Maria Biaggi dated February 3, 2020 re: joint status letter pursuant to Individual Rule IV(A)(2). Document filed by Carriage Services, Inc...(Biaggi, Maria)
December 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER re: #5 Order for Initial Pretrial Conference. It is hereby ORDERED that the December 5, 2019, initial pretrial conference is cancelled. If the parties believe that a conference would nevertheless be useful, they should inform the court immediately so the conference can be reinstated. The case management plan and scheduling order will issue in a separate order. The parties' attention is particularly directed to the provisions for periodic status letters, and the need for a pre-motion letter to avoid cancellation of the final conference and setting of a trial date. The parties should be aware that the Court does not extend the deadlines for fact discovery absent compelling circumstances. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 12/3/2019) (kv)
December 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER: All parties do not consent to conducting all further proceedings before a United States Magistrate Judge, including motions and trial. See 28 U.S.C. 636(c). The parties have conferred pursuant to Fed, R, Ciy. P, 26(f). This case is to be tried to a jury. Counsel for the parties have conferred and their present best estimate of the length of trial is 7 days. By 2/3/2020 the parties shall submit a joint status letter, as outlined in Individual Rule IV.A.2. By 4/17/2020 the parties shall submit a joint status letter, as outlined in Individual Rule IV.A.2 and, as further set forth herein. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter the dates under paragraphs 5, 6, 8(a), 9(b)-(c) and 13(a)-(c) into the Court's calendar. SO ORDERED. Amended Pleadings due by 2/7/2020. Joinder of Parties due by 2/7/2020. Deposition due by 5/1/2020. Fact Discovery due by 4/3/2020. Pre-Motion Conference set for 4/16/2020 at 10:30 AM before Judge Lorna G. Schofield. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 12/3/2019) (kv)
December 2, 2019 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED First Mediation Conference scheduled for 1/7/2020 at 10:00 AM in Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007.(smc)
November 27, 2019 Filing 15 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Alison Lobban Mangiatordi on behalf of Craig Duke. (Mangiatordi, Alison)
November 26, 2019 Filing 14 LETTER addressed to Judge Lorna G. Schofield from Judith A. Archer dated November 26, 2019 re: Information resolving the action at the initial conference scheduled for December 5, 2019 at 10:30 a.m. Document filed by Carriage Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Parties' draft Civil Management Plan and Scheduling Order)(Archer, Judith)
November 25, 2019 NOTICE OF MEDIATOR ASSIGNMENT - Notice of assignment of mediator. Mediator Schedule due by 12/26/2019.(mf)
November 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER OF AUTOMATIC REFERRAL TO MEDIATION (See M-10-468 Second Amended Standing Order). Please reference the Pilot Discovery Protocols, attached, and the Mediation Program Procedures (https://nysd.uscourts.gov/programs/mediation-adr). E-mail MediationOffice@nysd.uscourts.gov, telephone 212-805-0643. Mediator to be Assigned by 12/2/2019. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/1/2015) (mf)
November 18, 2019 Filing 12 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Carriage Services, Inc..(Archer, Judith)
November 15, 2019 Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint. Document filed by Carriage Services, Inc..(Archer, Judith)
October 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STIPULATION AND ORDER, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned attorneys for Plaintiff and Defendant int he above-captioned action that the attorney for Defendant will accept service of the Complaint for Defendant. Defendant's time to Answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is November 15, 2019. SO ORDERED. Carriage Services, Inc. answer due 11/15/2019. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 10/22/2019) (kv)
October 21, 2019 Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Order & Rules served on Judith A. Archer on 10/21/2019. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Craig Duke. (Pelton, Brent)
October 21, 2019 Filing 8 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Craig Duke. (Pelton, Brent)
October 18, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Judith A. Archer on behalf of Carriage Services, Inc.. (Archer, Judith)
October 18, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Maria Biaggi on behalf of Carriage Services, Inc.. (Biaggi, Maria)
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Initial Conference set for 12/5/2019 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 1106, Thurgood Marshal Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Lorna G. Schofield. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 10/18/2019) (cf)
October 9, 2019 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Carriage Services, Inc.. (pne)
October 9, 2019 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Lorna G. Schofield. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (pne)
October 9, 2019 Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pne)
October 9, 2019 Case Designated ECF. (pne)
October 9, 2019 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Brent Edward Pelton. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Cause of Action code 28:451. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Cause of Action code has been modified to 29:621. (pne)
October 8, 2019 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Pelton, Brent)
October 8, 2019 Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Carriage Services, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Craig Duke. (Pelton, Brent)
October 8, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Carriage Services, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-17737496)Document filed by Craig Duke.(Pelton, Brent)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Duke v. Carriage Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Craig Duke
Represented By: Brent Edward Pelton
Represented By: Alison Lobban Mangiatordi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carriage Services, Inc.
Represented By: Maria Biaggi
Represented By: Judith A. Archer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?