Smart Study Co., LTD. v. Jia Hua Trading Inc
| Smart Study Co., LTD. |
| Jia Hua Trading Inc |
| 1:2019cv09742 |
| October 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| P Kevin Castel |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 ANSWER to #1 Complaint. Document filed by Jia Hua Trading Inc.(Tsai, Pi Hui) |
| Filing 14 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #13 Letter filed by Smart Study Co., LTD. ENDORSEMENT: Initial conference adjourned from December 19, 2019 to January 22, 2020 at 11:15 a.m. (Initial Conference set for 1/22/2020 at 11:15 AM before Judge P. Kevin Castel.) (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 12/10/2019) (jwh) |
| Filing 13 LETTER addressed to Judge P. Kevin Castel from Kerry B. Brownlee dated December 9, 2019 re: Request for Adjournment of Initial Pretrial Conference. Document filed by Smart Study Co., LTD..(Brownlee, Kerry) |
| Filing 12 CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT as to Jia Hua Trading Inc. (km) |
| Filing 11 DECLARATION of Kerry B. Brownlee in Support re: #10 Proposed Clerk's Certificate of Default. Document filed by Smart Study Co., LTD.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Brownlee, Kerry) |
| Filing 10 PROPOSED CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT. Document filed by Smart Study Co., LTD.. (Brownlee, Kerry) Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). |
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Jia Hua Trading Inc served on 10/24/2019, answer due 11/14/2019. Service was accepted by Sue Zouky, Authorized Agent in the Office of the Secretary of State of the State of New York. Document filed by Smart Study Co., LTD.. (Brownlee, Kerry) |
Filing 8
ORDER INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Counsel for all parties are directed to appear for an Initial Pretrial Conference, in accordance with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on December 19, 2019 at 11:30 a.m. in Courtroom 11D at the United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York. Principal trial counsel must appear at this and all subsequent conferences. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF (OR THE REMOVING DEFENDANT) IS DIRECTED TO IMMEDIATELY SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO ALL PARTIES. SO ORDERED. (Initial Conference set for 12/19/2019 at 11:30 AM in Courtroom 11D, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge P. Kevin Castel.) (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 10/24/19) (yv)
|
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Jia Hua Trading Inc. (pne) |
| Filing 6 AO 121 FORM COPYRIGHT - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 17 U.S.C. 508, the Register of Copyrights is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following copyright(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Form e-mailed to Register of Copyrights. (pne) |
| Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pne) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge P. Kevin Castel. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (pne) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pne) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Jia Hua Trading Inc, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Smart Study Co., LTD.. (Brownlee, Kerry) |
| Filing 4 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Smart Study Co., LTD..(Brownlee, Kerry) |
| Filing 3 AO 121 FORM COPYRIGHT - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 121 Form Copyright for case opening submitted to court for review.(Brownlee, Kerry) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Brownlee, Kerry) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jia Hua Trading Inc. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-17811784)Document filed by Smart Study Co., LTD.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Brownlee, Kerry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smart Study Co., LTD. v. Jia Hua Trading Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Smart Study Co., LTD. | |
| Represented By: | Kerry Brenae Brownlee |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jia Hua Trading Inc | |
| Represented By: | Pi Hui Tsai |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
