The New York Times Company v. Department of Defense et al
| The New York Times Company |
| Department of Defense and Office of the Director of National Intelligence |
| 1:2019cv09821 |
| October 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Vernon S Broderick |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 ANSWER to #4 Complaint. Document filed by Department of Defense, Office of the Director of National Intelligence.(Sun, Anthony) |
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer: APPLICATION GRANTED. (Department of Defense answer due 12/20/2019; Office of the Director of National Intelligence answer due 12/20/2019.) (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 11/26/2019) (jwh)
|
| Filing 11 CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #4 Complaint addressed to Judge Vernon S. Broderick from AUSA Anthony J. Sun dated 11/25/2019. Document filed by Department of Defense, Office of the Director of National Intelligence.(Sun, Anthony) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Anthony Jan-Huan Sun on behalf of Department of Defense, Office of the Director of National Intelligence. (Sun, Anthony) |
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Office of the Director of National Intelligence. (jgo) |
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Department of Defense. (jgo) |
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
| Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (jgo) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Vernon S. Broderick. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (jgo) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Alexandra Perloff-Giles on behalf of The New York Times Company. (Perloff-Giles, Alexandra) |
| Filing 6 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Office of the Director of National Intelligence, re: #4 Complaint. Document filed by The New York Times Company. (McCraw, David) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Department of Defense, re: #4 Complaint. Document filed by The New York Times Company. (McCraw, David) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Department of Defense, Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Document filed by The New York Times Company.(McCraw, David) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (McCraw, David) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Other Affiliate Blackrock, Inc. for The New York Times Company. Document filed by The New York Times Company.(McCraw, David) |
| Filing 1 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - SIGNATURE ERROR - COMPLAINT against Department of Defense, Office of the Director of National Intelligence. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-17827342)Document filed by The New York Times Company.(McCraw, David) Modified on 10/24/2019 (jgo). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
