Matzura v. Regal Cinemas, Inc.
Steven Matzura and James Murphy |
Regal Cinemas, Inc. |
1:2019cv09930 |
October 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Andrew L Carter |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 STIPULATION: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff and Defendant that Defendant's time to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint in the above captioned action is extended to and including January 3, 2020. SO ORDERED., Regal Cinemas, Inc. answer due 1/3/2020., Motions terminated: #6 CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint or Otherwise Respond addressed to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. from Sean J. Kirby dated November 27, 2019. filed by Regal Cinemas, Inc.. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 11/27/2019) (rj) |
Filing 6 CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint or Otherwise Respond addressed to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. from Sean J. Kirby dated November 27, 2019. Document filed by Regal Cinemas, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Stipulation)(Kirby, Sean) |
Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Regal Cinemas, Inc. served on 11/12/2019, answer due 12/3/2019. Service was accepted by Regina; Authorized Agent. Document filed by James Murphy. (Khorozian, Zare) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Regal Cinemas, Inc.. (dnh) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Zare Khorozian. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Steven Matzura. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name contained a typographical error. (dnh) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Zare Khorozian. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code New York; Fee Status code due (due). The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to XX Out of State; the Fee Status code has been modified to pd (paid). (dnh) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (dnh) |
Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (dnh) |
Case Designated ECF. (dnh) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Khorozian, Zare) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Regal Cinemas, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Steven Matzura. (Khorozian, Zare) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Regal Cinemas, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-17839579)Document filed by Steven Matzura.(Khorozian, Zare) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.