El Bey et al v. Lopez et al
Aqueelah Sovereign El Bey and Abdul Hadi El Bey |
Melchor E. Castro, Sheriff's Department Deputies Mum, D. Root no. 3941, CPL. Pfeffer, Caitlin Toomey, Officer Edwards First, Joseph G. Nesser, Officer Adam Brodsky, State of New York, Rochester Police Department, Teresa Johnson, Nicole E Bayly-Henshaw, Stg. Anthony Dulbecco, District Attorney Sandra J. Doorley, Esq., New York Superior Court, Caroline Morrison, Daniel R. Rizzo, Amy Tutino, Brian E Cala, Anna Thomas, Michael C Lopez, Thomas Rainbow Morse, Ellen Yacknin, Michael J. Tallon, Lovely Ann Warren and Zachary Sobieraski |
1:2019cv09978 |
October 24, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Colleen McMahon |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Mailed a copy of #3 Order Directing Payment of Fee or IFP Application, to Abdul Hadi El Bey c/o 662 Wilkins St. Rochester, NY Exempt. (aea) |
|
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Colleen McMahon. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (wb) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court, County of New York. Case Number: 27197710. Document filed by Aqueelah Sovereign El Bey, Abdul Hadi El Bey. (sac) |
Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Aqueelah Sovereign El Bey. (sac) |
Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.