Teran et al v. Nai Tapas Restaurant Corp. et al
Plaintiff: Andres Emeterio Teran
Defendant: Ruben Rodriguez and Nai Tapas Restaurant Corp.
Case Number: 1:2019cv10134
Filed: October 31, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: J Paul Oetken
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 26, 2019 Filing 12 ANSWER to #8 Complaint. Document filed by Nai Tapas Restaurant Corp., Ruben Rodriguez.(Weiss, Adam)
December 26, 2019 Filing 11 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Nai Tapas Restaurant Corp., Ruben Rodriguez.(Weiss, Adam)
November 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STIPULATION EXTENDING DEFENDANTS' TIME TO ANSWER. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the undersigned attorneys for the parties herein that Defendants acknowledges proper service of the summons and complaint in this action; and IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the time for Defendants to answer, move or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended to and includes December 31, 2019. So ordered. Nai Tapas Restaurant Corp. answer due 12/31/2019; Ruben Rodriguez answer due 12/31/2019. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 11/22/2019) (rjm)
November 22, 2019 Filing 9 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Nai Tapas Restaurant Corp., Ruben Rodriguez. (Weiss, Adam)
November 1, 2019 Filing 8 COMPLAINT against Nai Tapas Restaurant Corp., Ruben Rodriguez. Document filed by Andres Emeterio Teran(on behalf of himself), Andres Emeterio Teran(on behalf of FLSA Collective Plaintiffs).(Lee, C.K.)
November 1, 2019 Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Ruben Rodriguez. (vf)
November 1, 2019 Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Nai Tapas Restaurant Corp. (vf)
November 1, 2019 Case Designated ECF. (vf)
November 1, 2019 Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (vf)
November 1, 2019 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge J. Paul Oetken. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (vf)
November 1, 2019 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney C.K. Lee to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Complaint. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the pleading was not signed. Re-file the pleading using the event type Complaint found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. (vf)
October 31, 2019 Filing 5 CONSENT TO SUE UNDER THE F.L.S.A.. Document filed by Andres Emeterio Teran(on behalf of himself), Andres Emeterio Teran(on behalf of FLSA Collective Plaintiffs).(Lee, C.K.)
October 31, 2019 Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Lee, C.K.)
October 31, 2019 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Ruben Rodriguez, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Andres Emeterio Teran(on behalf of himself), Andres Emeterio Teran(on behalf of FLSA Collective Plaintiffs). (Lee, C.K.)
October 31, 2019 Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Nai Tapas Restaurant Corp., re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Andres Emeterio Teran(on behalf of himself), Andres Emeterio Teran(on behalf of FLSA Collective Plaintiffs). (Lee, C.K.)
October 31, 2019 Filing 1 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - SIGNATURE ERROR - COMPLAINT against Nai Tapas Restaurant Corp., Ruben Rodriguez. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-17870897)Document filed by Andres Emeterio Teran(on behalf of himself), Andres Emeterio Teran(on behalf of FLSA Collective Plaintiffs).(Lee, C.K.) Modified on 11/1/2019 (vf).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Teran et al v. Nai Tapas Restaurant Corp. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ruben Rodriguez
Represented By: Adam Casimir Weiss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nai Tapas Restaurant Corp.
Represented By: Adam Casimir Weiss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andres Emeterio Teran
Represented By: C.K. Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?