Strachn v. NYPD et al
| Kawahn Strachn |
| Frias Railyng, Edmonds, Gomez, NYPD, Lieutenant Edmonds, City of New York and Officer Gomez |
| 1:2019cv10212 |
| November 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| J Paul Oetken |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. City of New York waiver sent on 12/26/2019, answer due 2/24/2020. Document filed by City of New York. (Decastro, Maria)
|
|
Filing 10
LETTER from Kawahn Strachn re: (UPDATED SERVICE ADDRESS) - Plaintiff writes that, in light of the return of service as unexecuted, the United States Marshals serve all defendants at the following address: Attn: Legal Bureau - Civil, 1 Police Plaza, New York, New York 10038. Document filed by Kawahn Strachn.(sc)
|
|
Filing 9
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE UNEXECUTED as to Lieutenant Edmonds. Attempted Service of Summons and Complaint. Service was attempted on 12/11/19. Document filed by Kawahn Strachn. (sc)
|
|
Filing 8
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE UNEXECUTED as to Officer Gomez. Attempted Service of Summons and Complaint. Service was attempted on 12/11/19. Document filed by Kawahn Strachn. (sc)
|
|
Filing 7
AMENDED COMPLAINT; re: amending #2 Complaint against City of New York, Lieutenant Edmonds, Officer Gomez, Frias Railyng with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Kawahn Strachn. Related document: #2 Complaint.(sc)
|
|
Filing 6
INFORMATION PACKAGE MAILED to Kawahn Strachn, at 85-15 101st. Avenue Ozone Park, NY 11416, on 11/15/2019 Re: #5 Order of Service via REGULAR MAIL. The following document(s) were enclosed in the Service Package: a copy of the order of service or order to answer and other orders entered to date, the individual practices of the district judge and magistrate judge assigned to your case, Instructions for Litigants Who Do Not Have Attorneys, Notice Regarding Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Case Files, a flyer about the free legal assistance clinic located in the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse (only in non prisoner cases), a Motions guide, a notice that the Pro Se Manual has been discontinued, a Notice of Change of Address form to use if your contact information changes, a handout explaining matters handled by magistrate judges and consent form to complete if all parties agree to proceed for all purposes before the magistrate judge, a form for you to complete if you consent to receive filings electronically (only in nonprisoner cases). (bwa)
|
|
SUMMONS ISSUED as to City of New York, Edmonds, Gomez, Frias Railyng. (bwa)
|
|
FRCP 4 SERVICE PACKAGE HAND DELIVERED TO U.S.M.: on 11/15/2019 Re: Judge J. Paul Oetken #5 Order of Service. The following document(s) were enclosed in the Service Package: Summons, IFP, Order of Service, Completed U.S.M. form(s) for defendant(s)City of New York, Officer Gomez, Frias Railyng, Shield No. 30952, Lieutenant Edmonds. (bwa)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER OF SERVICE. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, together with an information package. The Court dismisses Plaintiffs claims against the New York Police Department because it cannot be sued in the name of the agency. The Clerk of Court is directed to add the City of New York as a Defendant under Fed. R. Civ. P. 21. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to complete the USM-285 forms with the addresses for Defendants City of New York, Officer Gomez, Officer Frias Railyng, and Lieutenant Edmonds, and deliver to the U.S. Marshals Service all documents necessary to effect service. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. (USM-285 Form due by 12/16/2019. Request for Issuance of Summons due by 12/16/2019.) City of New York added. NYPD terminated. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 11/14/2019) (rjm) Transmission to Pro Se Assistants for processing.
|
|
NOTICE OF MAILING: COPY OF THE COURT'S NOVEMBER 14, 2019 ORDER MAILED TO PLAINTIFF AT THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS: Kawahn Strachn 85-15 101st. Avenue Ozone Park, NY 11416 (bh)
|
|
Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (wb)
|
|
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge J. Paul Oetken. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (wb)
|
|
Mailed a copy of #3 Order Granting IFP Application to Kawahn Strachn 85-15 101st. Avenue Ozone Park, NY 11416. (vba)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. 28 U.S.C. 1915. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 11/4/2019) (va) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT against Edmonds, Gomez, NYPD, Frias Railyng. Document filed by Kawahn Strachn. (sac)
|
|
Filing 1
REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Kawahn Strachn. (sac)
|
|
Case Designated ECF. (sac)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
