Echevarria v. Brandes et al
| Vicente Emilio Mesa Echevarria |
| Urology Dept. Probation, Steve Brandes and Lavra Rolo |
| 1:2019cv10268 |
| November 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Sarah L Cave |
| Paul A Engelmayer |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 in |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for General Pretrial (includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement). Referred to US Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 11/7/2019) (jwh)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Steve Brandes, Lavra Rolo, Urology Dept. Probation. (Filing Fee $ $400.00, Receipt Number 465401247761)Document filed by Vicente Emilio Mesa Echevarria.(rdz) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (rdz) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Steve Brandes, Lavra Rolo, Urology Dept. Probation. (rdz) |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
| Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
