Guglielmo v. Acme Electric Motor, Inc.
Joseph Guglielmo |
Acme Electric Moror, Inc. and Acme Electric Motor, Inc. |
1:2019cv10385 |
November 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Vernon S Broderick |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE of Substitution of Attorney. Old Attorney: Russel Weinrib, New Attorney: David P. Force, Address: Stein Saks, PLLC, 285 Passaic St., Hackensack, New Jersey, United States 07601, 2012826500. Document filed by Joseph Guglielmo. (Force, David) |
Filing 7 ORDER: granting #6 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Application Granted. SO ORDERED. Acme Electric Motor, Inc. answer due 1/27/2020 (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 12/04/2019) (ama) |
Filing 6 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Vernon S. Broderick from Jonathan A. Wexler dated December 3, 2019. Document filed by Acme Electric Motor, Inc..(Wexler, Jonathan) |
Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Acme Electric Motor, Inc.. (dnh) |
Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to ACME ELECTRIC MOTOR, INC., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Joseph Guglielmo. (Weinrib, Russel) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Russel Craig Weinrib to RE-FILE Document No. #3 Request for Issuance of Summons. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): party name on 'as to' docket entry text contains a typographical error;. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (jgo) |
Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Russel Craig Weinrib. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Acme Electric Motor, Inc.. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name contained a typographical error;. (jgo) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Vernon S. Broderick. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (jgo) |
Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (jgo) |
Filing 3 FILING ERROR - SUMMONS REQUEST As To - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Acme Electric Moror, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Joseph Guglielmo. (Weinrib, Russel) Modified on 11/12/2019 (jgo). |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Weinrib, Russel) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Acme Electric Moror, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-17945299)Document filed by Joseph Guglielmo.(Weinrib, Russel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.