Mendez v. Ann Inc.
Himelda Mendez |
Ann Inc. d/b/a Loft and Ann Inc. |
1:2019cv10623 |
November 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Analisa Torres |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE. Ann Inc. served on 12/12/2019, answer due 2/7/2020. Service was accepted by COLLEEN BANAHAN, Legal Clerk. Document filed by Himelda Mendez. (Marks, Bradly) |
Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Ann Inc. waiver sent on 12/9/2019, answer due 2/7/2020. Document filed by Ann Inc.. (Fleming, Michael) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Michael Friel Fleming on behalf of Ann Inc.. (Fleming, Michael) |
Filing 6 ORDER: To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. (As further set forth in this Order.) The parties are free to withhold consent without negative consequences. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 11/18/2019) (cf) |
Filing 5 INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER: Initial Conference set for 1/21/2020 at 11:40 AM in Courtroom 15D, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Analisa Torres. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 11/18/2019) (cf) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Ann Inc.. (sj) |
Case Designated ECF. (sj) |
Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (sj) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Bradly Gurion Marks. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Ann Inc.. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: alias party type was entered incorrectly. (sj) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Bradly Gurion Marks. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Jury Demand code n (None). The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Jury Demand code has been modified to p (Plaintiff). (sj) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Analisa Torres. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (sj) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Ann Inc. d/b/a Loft, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Himelda Mendez. (Marks, Bradly) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Marks, Bradly) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ann Inc. d/b/a Loft. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-18076366)Document filed by Himelda Mendez.(Marks, Bradly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.