Lewis v. Ditomasso, et al
| Regina Lewis |
| John/Jane Doe, Orange County Department of Social Service, Safe Harbors of the Hudson Independent Living Inc., Independent Living Inc. and Valentina Ditomasso |
| 1:2019cv10665 |
| November 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Colleen McMahon |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Certified Copy of Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re: #6 Notice of Appeal. (nd) |
| Appeal Record Sent to USCA (Electronic File). Certified Indexed record on Appeal Electronic Files for #6 Notice of Appeal filed by Regina Lewis were transmitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (nd) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEAL from #4 Order of Dismissal,,, #5 Judgment. Document filed by Regina Lewis. Form D-P is due within 14 days to the Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. (Attachments: #1 Motion IFP)(nd) |
| Appeal Fee Due: for #6 Notice of Appeal. $505.00 Appeal fee due by 1/9/2020. (IFP DENIED On 12/6/2019).(nd) |
| Mailed a copy of #4 Order of Dismissal, #5 Judgment - Sua Sponte (Complaint), Notice of Appeal Forms, to Regina Lewis 21 Kenney Ct. Newburgh, NY 12550. (vba) |
Filing 5
CIVIL JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the order issued December 6, 2019, dismissing the complaint, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the complaint is dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff can proceed in this Court only through a guardian ad litem. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this judgment to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 12/6/2019) (Attachments: #1 Appeal Package)(mro) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket, mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, and note service on the docket. Plaintiff's complaint, filed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1), is dismissed without prejudice because she can proceed in this Court only through a guardian ad litem. The Clerk of Court is directed to docket this as a "written opinion" within the meaning of Section 205(a)(5) of the E-Government Act of 2002. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 12/6/2019) (mro) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Colleen McMahon. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (mro) |
| Filing 3 LETTER addressed to Judge Colleen McMahon from Regina Lewis dated 11/6/2019 re: I could be wrong, but at this time, I am left to presume that the oversight responsibility for the District is you. Document filed by Regina Lewis.(rdz) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against John/Jane Doe. Document filed by Regina Lewis.(rdz) (Main Document 2 replaced on 11/19/2019) (rdz). |
| Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Regina Lewis.(rdz) |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
