Cutts v. Miller
| Aljulah Cutts |
| Christopher Miller |
| 1:2019cv10721 |
| November 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Ronnie Abrams |
| Colleen McMahon |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
INFORMATION PACKAGE MAILED to Aljulah Cutts DIN No. 12A3019, at Great Meadow Correctional Facility 11739 State Route 22 P.O. Box 51 Comstock, NY 12821-0051, on 12/9/2019 Re: #5 Order to Answer via REGULAR MAIL. The following document(s) were enclosed in the Service Package: a copy of the order of service or order to answer and other orders entered to date, the individual practices of the district judge and magistrate judge assigned to your case, Instructions for Litigants Who Do Not Have Attorneys, Notice Regarding Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Case Files, a Motions guide, a notice that the Pro Se Manual has been discontinued, a Notice of Change of Address form to use if your contact information changes, a handout explaining matters handled by magistrate judges and consent form to complete if all parties agree to proceed for all purposes before the magistrate judge. (bwa)
|
|
Mailed a copy of #5 Order to Answer, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus to the Attorney General of the State of New York, 28 Liberty Street, New York, New York, 10005 by Certified Mail # 7019 1640 0002 1693 8094 with Return Receipt Requested. (bwa)
|
|
Mailed a copy of #5 Order to Answer, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus to the District Attorney of New York County, 1 Hogan Place, New York, New York 10013 by Certified Mail # 7019 1640 0002 1693 8100 with Return Receipt Requested. (bwa)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO ANSWER, 28 U.S.C. 2254: Having examined this petition under 28 U.S.C. 2254, the Court hereby ORDERS that: The Clerk of Court shall serve a copy of this order and of the petition on the Attorney General of the State of New York by certified mail to 28 Liberty Street, New York, New York, 10005; and on the District Attorney of New York County by certified mail to 1 Hogan Place, New York, New York 10013. Within sixty days of the date of this order, Respondent shall file and serve (1) an answer to the petition and (2) the transcripts and briefs identified in Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Petitioner may file and serve reply papers, if any, within thirty days from the date he is served with Respondent's answer. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 12/6/2019) (rj) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing 4
APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS. Document filed by Aljulah Cutts.(sc)
|
|
Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (wb)
|
|
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Ronnie Abrams. Judge Colleen McMahon is no longer assigned to the case. (wb)
|
|
Pro Se Payment of Fee Processed: $5.00 Check processed by the Finance Department on 11/21/2019, Receipt Number 465401249086. (sw)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEE OR IFP APPLICATION: Petitioner is directed to render payment of the filing fee or submit an IFP application to this Court's Pro Se Office within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Filing Fee due by 12/20/2019. In Forma Pauperis (IFP) Application due by 12/20/2019. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 11/20/2019) (Attachments: #1 IFP application)(dmg) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Colleen McMahon. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (wb)
|
|
Mailed a copy of #2 Order Directing Payment of Fee or IFP Application, to Aljulah Cutts DIN No. 12A3019 Great Meadow Correctional Facility 11739 State Route 22 P.O. Box 51 Comstock, NY 12821-0051. (aea)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Document filed by Aljulah Cutts. (sac)
|
|
Case Designated ECF. (sac)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cutts v. Miller | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Aljulah Cutts | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Christopher Miller | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
