Davis v. Associated Restaurant Services, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Mr. Edward Davis and Edward Davis
Defendant: Associated Restaurant Services, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2019cv11061
Filed: December 3, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Debra C Freeman
Referring Judge: J Paul Oetken
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Conference set for 2/12/2020 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 17A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman. The parties are directed to submit, no later than February 5, 2020, a jointly proposed discovery plan, pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This submission should address all of the matters set out in Rule 26(f)(3), and should specifically include proposed deadlines for as further set forth in this Order. Counsel should fax a copy of their proposed discovery plan to the Chambers of the undersigned, at (212) 805-4658. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman on 12/20/19) Copies to: All counsel (via ECF). (yv)
December 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF REFERENCE TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for General Pretrial (includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement). Referred to Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 12/4/2019) (kv)
December 4, 2019 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge J. Paul Oetken. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions. (jgo)
December 4, 2019 Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo)
December 4, 2019 Case Designated ECF. (jgo)
December 4, 2019 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney John M. Downing, Jr. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Jury Demand code b (Both); Dollar Demand $3000000000; County code New York; Fee Status code due (due);. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Jury Demand code has been modified to d (Defendant); the Dollar Demand has been modified to $3000000; the County code has been modified to XX Out of State; the Fee Status code has been modified to pd (paid);. (jgo)
December 4, 2019 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney John M. Downing, Jr re: Document No. #3 Notice of Removal. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): all of the parties listed on the pleading were not entered on CM ECF. Add party John Doe. Docket the event type Add Party to Pleading found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents... (jgo)
December 4, 2019 Civil Case Opening Fee Paid electronically via Pay.gov: for #3 Notice of Removal,. Filing fee $ 400.00. Pay.gov receipt number ANYSDC-18190817, paid on 12/3/2019. (jgo)
December 3, 2019 Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Notice of Removal, Rule 7.1 Statement served on Plaintiff on December 3, 2019. Service was made by MAIL. Document filed by Associated Restaurant Services, Inc.. (Downing, John)
December 3, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme Court, County of New York. Case Number: 156849/2019..Document filed by Associated Restaurant Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit Verified Answer, #3 Exhibit Plaintiff's Response to Demand)(Downing, John)
December 3, 2019 Filing 2 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Associated Restaurant Services, Inc..(Downing, John)
December 3, 2019 Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Downing, John)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. Associated Restaurant Services, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mr. Edward Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edward Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Associated Restaurant Services, Inc.
Represented By: John M. Downing, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?