Fischler v. Handy Technologies, Inc
| Brian Fischler |
| Handy Technologies, Inc |
| 1:2019cv11141 |
| December 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Andrew L Carter |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 cv |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. SO ORDERED. Handy Technologies, Inc answer due 2/24/2020. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 1/27/2020) (rj)
|
| Filing 6 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. from Guy Cohen dated 1/24/2020. Document filed by Handy Technologies, Inc.(Cohen, Guy) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. Handy Technologies, Inc served on 12/11/2019, answer due 1/2/2020. Service was accepted by Sue Zouky, authorized agent in the Office of the Secretary of State of New York. Document filed by Brian Fischler. (Lipsky, Douglas) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Handy Technologies, Inc. (jgo) |
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
| Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions. (jgo) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Lipsky, Douglas) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Handy Technologies, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Brian Fischler. (Lipsky, Douglas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Handy Technologies, Inc. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-18214793)Document filed by Brian Fischler.(Lipsky, Douglas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Fischler v. Handy Technologies, Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Handy Technologies, Inc | |
| Represented By: | Guy Robert Cohen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Brian Fischler | |
| Represented By: | Douglas Brian Lipsky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
