Kodak Alaris Holdings Limited v. Eastman Kodak Company
| Kodak Alaris Holdings Limited |
| Eastman Kodak Company |
| 1:2019cv11424 |
| December 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Naomi Reice Buchwald |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Michael James Adams on behalf of Eastman Kodak Company..(Adams, Michael) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,., COUNTERCLAIM against Kodak Alaris Holdings Limited. Document filed by Eastman Kodak Company..(Ward, Eric) |
| Filing 11 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Eastman Kodak Company..(Ward, Eric) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Eric J Ward on behalf of Eastman Kodak Company..(Ward, Eric) |
Filing 9
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT'S TIME TO ANSWER: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned counsel for all parties, subject to approval of the Court, that: Defendant's time to answer the Complaint shall be extended through and including February 20, 2020. Defendant's answer may include counterclaims as Defendant deems appropriate. Defendant will not move to dismiss the Complaint nor will request further adjournment of its time to answer. Defendant acknowledges that this Court has jurisdiction, that venue is proper, and that Defendant has been properly and duly served with the Summons and Complaint. SO ORDERED., Eastman Kodak Company answer due 2/20/2020. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 1/22/2020) (ama)
|
| Filing 8 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Eastman Kodak Company. (Ward, Eric) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Eastman Kodak Company served on 12/31/2019, answer due 1/21/2020. Document filed by Kodak Alaris Holdings Limited. (Dunn, David) |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Eastman Kodak Company. (dnh) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Eastman Kodak Company, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Kodak Alaris Holdings Limited. (Dunn, David) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions. (jgo) |
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
| Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney David Dunn to RE-FILE Document No. #3 Request for Issuance of Summons,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the form used for the summons is not the official A.O. Summons form;. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (jgo) |
| Filing 4 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent KPP (No. 2) Trustees Limited for Kodak Alaris Holdings Limited. Document filed by Kodak Alaris Holdings Limited.(Dunn, David) |
| Filing 3 FILING ERROR - SUMMONS REQUEST PDF ERROR - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Eastman Kodak Company, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Kodak Alaris Holdings Limited. (Dunn, David) Modified on 12/16/2019 (jgo). |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Dunn, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Eastman Kodak Company. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-18275709)Document filed by Kodak Alaris Holdings Limited. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Amended and Restated Stock and Asset Purchase Agreement, #2 Exhibit B -Schedule II - Contingent Purchase Price Adjustment)(Dunn, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kodak Alaris Holdings Limited v. Eastman Kodak Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kodak Alaris Holdings Limited | |
| Represented By: | David Dunn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Eastman Kodak Company | |
| Represented By: | Eric J Ward |
| Represented By: | Michael James Adams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
