Nago v. Bloomberg L.P.
Plaintiff: Damon C. Nago
Defendant: Bloomberg L.P.
Case Number: 1:2019cv11483
Filed: December 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: George B Daniels
Referring Judge: Ona T Wang
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER: An Initial Pretrial Conference pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is scheduled for Wednesday, March 04, 2020, at 11:30 a.m. in Courtroom 20D, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York. Any party proceeding pro se (without an attorney) must appear in person. Any party who has retained counsel prior to the conference need not personally attend and should instead have their attorney attend on their behalf. The parties will be required to discuss at the conference the subjects set forth in Rule 16(b) and (c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In particular, the parties should be prepared to discuss what discovery is necessary for the claims and defenses in this case and further set forth in this Order. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to send a copy of this Order to the pro se Plaintiff. (Initial Conference set for 3/4/2020 at 11:30 AM in Courtroom 20D, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 1/13/2020) (rro) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
January 13, 2020 Mailed a copy of #11 Order for Initial Pretrial Conference, to Damon C. Nago 117 Elmwood Road Verona, NJ 07044. (aea)
January 10, 2020 Filing 10 ANSWER to #2 Complaint. Document filed by Bloomberg L.P..(Garland, David)
January 10, 2020 Filing 9 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Other Affiliate Bloomberg Inc. for Bloomberg L.P.. Document filed by Bloomberg L.P..(Garland, David)
January 10, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Elizabeth Dennison Houghton on behalf of Bloomberg L.P.. (Houghton, Elizabeth)
January 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 PRO SE PRETRIAL ORDER. Pro se Plaintiff and counsel for all parties are hereby notified that this case is referred to Magistrate Ona T. Wang, for the purposes of Case Management and Scheduling pursuant to Federal Rule Civil Procedure 16. You are directed to furnish all attorneys in this action with copies of this order and enclosures. If you are unaware of the identity of counsel for any of the parties, you must send a copy of the notice and rules to that party personally. All correspondence to the Court should be addressed to the chambers of Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang and submitted to the Pro Se Intake Unit, located in the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, New York 10007 telephone (212) 805-0175. Any procedural questions by Pro Se plaintiff should be addressed to the Office of Pro Se Intake Unit at (212) 805-0175. So ordered. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 12/19/2019) (rjm)
January 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for General Pretrial (includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement) and Dispositive Motion (i.e., motion requiring a Report and Recommendation). Referred to Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 1/6/2020) (rjm)
January 6, 2020 Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Bloomberg L.P. c/o David Levine, General Counsel, served on 12/20/2019, answer due 1/10/2020. Service was accepted by Lois Seligson. Document filed by Damon C. Nago. (sc)
December 16, 2019 Filing 3 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: Damon C. Nago consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by Damon C. Nago.(rdz)
December 16, 2019 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Bloomberg L.P.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number 465401250578) Document filed by Damon C. Nago.(rdz) Modified on 12/17/2019 (rdz).
December 16, 2019 Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (rdz)
December 16, 2019 Case Designated ECF. (rdz)
December 16, 2019 Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (rdz)
December 16, 2019 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Bloomberg L.P.. (rdz)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nago v. Bloomberg L.P.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bloomberg L.P.
Represented By: Elizabeth Dennison Houghton
Represented By: David Wayne Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Damon C. Nago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?