Moore v. Manhattan District Attorneys Office
Plaintiff: Eugene Moore
Defendant: Manhattan District Attorneys Office
Case Number: 1:2019cv11602
Filed: December 17, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Colleen McMahon
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 20, 2019 Mailed a copy of #2 Order of Dismissal, #3 Judgment - Sua Sponte (Complaint), with Notice of Right to Appeal, to Eugene Moore DIN No. 19A1628 Mid-State Correctional Facility P.O. Box 2500 Marcy, NY 13403. (aea)
December 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CIVIL JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the complaint is dismissed without prejudice to the pending action under docket number 1:19-CV-08940 (CM). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this judgment to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 12/19/2019) (Attachments: #1 Pro Se Appeal Package) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
December 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Plaintiff, currently incarcerated at Mid-State Correctional Facility, brings this pro se action under 42 U.S.C. 1983, asserting claims against the Manhattan District Attorney's Office in connection with Plaintiff's criminal proceedings in New York County. For the following reasons, the complaint is dismissed. Plaintiff has previously submitted to this Court a substantially similar complaint against the Manhattan District Attorney's Office, arising from the same criminal proceedings. That case is pending before me under ECF 1:19-CV-08940 (CM). Because this complaint asserts claims against the same party and arises out of the same criminal proceedings, no useful purpose would be served by the filing and litigation of this duplicate lawsuit. Therefore, this complaint is dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiff's pending case under docket number 1:19-CV-08940 (CM). The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, and note service on the docket. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed as duplicative. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 12/19/2019) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
December 19, 2019 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Colleen McMahon. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (sac)
December 17, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Manhattan District Attorneys Office. Document filed by Eugene Moore. (sac)
December 17, 2019 Case Designated ECF. (sac)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore v. Manhattan District Attorneys Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eugene Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Manhattan District Attorneys Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?