Pro Music Rights, LLC v. YouTube, LLC
Pro Music Rights, LLC |
YouTube, LLC |
1:2019cv11618 |
December 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
George B Daniels |
Copyright |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 cp |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. YouTube, LLC waiver sent on 1/21/2020, answer due 3/23/2020. Document filed by Pro Music Rights, LLC..(Gora, Richard) |
Filing 6 INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 3/19/2020 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 11A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge George B. Daniels. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 12/27/2019) (cf) |
Filing 5 AO 121 FORM COPYRIGHT - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 17 U.S.C. 508, the Register of Copyrights is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following copyright(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Form e-mailed to Register of Copyrights. (dnh) |
Case Designated ECF. (dnh) |
Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (dnh) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge George B. Daniels. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions. (dnh) |
Filing 4 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Pro Music Rights, LLC.(Gora, Richard) |
Filing 3 AO 121 FORM COPYRIGHT - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 121 Form Copyright for case opening submitted to court for review.(Gora, Richard) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Gora, Richard) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against YouTube, LLC. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-18314673)Document filed by Pro Music Rights, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Copyright Registrations)(Gora, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pro Music Rights, LLC v. YouTube, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Pro Music Rights, LLC | |
Represented By: | Richard Steven Gora |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: YouTube, LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.